- 07 Dec 14, 04:33#429181
Um, it's not a "veto" for there to be a veto there would have to be a vote and a team with the power to override the results of the vote. Mercedes is simply agreeing to the rules Renault and Ferrari and Mercedes and Honda agreed to as well.
I'm starting to think that you are never going to at the very least read and educate yourself before declaring that the sky is green. You can say something all you want, but you're wrong, you'll always be wrong and now you're simply looking rather foolish by repeating stuff that's been clearly debunked in many references here. Please stop the littering, I'm afraid you'll put off perspective members by making the forum seem as if it's permeated with the stench of fresh fertilizer.
........The have-not teams have to do the best they can in getting through 2015 and then prepare for the new democratic rules in 2016.....
OB - how are the 2015 rules not democratic?
For 2015 Merc has vetoed the majority. In 2016 the engine rules will be decided by majority vote.
Um, it's not a "veto" for there to be a veto there would have to be a vote and a team with the power to override the results of the vote. Mercedes is simply agreeing to the rules Renault and Ferrari and Mercedes and Honda agreed to as well.
I'm starting to think that you are never going to at the very least read and educate yourself before declaring that the sky is green. You can say something all you want, but you're wrong, you'll always be wrong and now you're simply looking rather foolish by repeating stuff that's been clearly debunked in many references here. Please stop the littering, I'm afraid you'll put off perspective members by making the forum seem as if it's permeated with the stench of fresh fertilizer.
"I don't want to be part of a forum where everyone has differing opinions." Boom...