- 03 Oct 14, 02:10#419048
The article simply pointed out that women over 40 are different
in comparison to their younger counterparts and that they should
be celebrated for that difference.
The implication is that even though, generally speaking, younger
women are viewed as being worth more than women over 40, the
latter are in fact equally worth a second glance.
After the agony of defeat, success will be sweet!
Hammer278 wrote:Calm down!! No one said men over 40 weren't worth as much.sagi58 wrote:And why aren't """""""""men over 40"""""""""" worth as much?LRW wrote:...exceptions to what?
The inclination that """generally speaking""" men/society have towards not appreciating how much women over 40 are worth.
((i.e., in reference to the post by What's Burning?))
Okay we listed out why women over 40 are so awesome, I bet if someone had enough time on their hands they could make and equally long list for men over 40 too.
WBs post was reg an article written by a guy. His apology is his, none elses.
The article simply pointed out that women over 40 are different
in comparison to their younger counterparts and that they should
be celebrated for that difference.
The implication is that even though, generally speaking, younger
women are viewed as being worth more than women over 40, the
latter are in fact equally worth a second glance.
After the agony of defeat, success will be sweet!
- By hass25