Someone has to stand up to these perpetual distorters of the truth which could influence younger viewers.
Also why has this forum not got a rule that says members are obliged to speak the truth to the best of their knowledge? Knowingly misleading others, or knowingly misrepresenting ones self or blatantly posting libelous stuff about public figures is not even touched in the rules although it says we may not call the nicknames???
So we can lie and make up stories about F1 drivers and spread rumours, maybe accuse them of child abuse and mental health issues BUT WE MUST NOT CALL THEM by their nicknames?
And we almost had to capitalise their names and spell them correctly as well as disguise swear words in ways that a 4 year old with dyslexia would recognise upside down?
Having said that posting wouldnt be much fun if we couldnt lay into flabio, max and bernie with a few embellishements
But being serious now, there really should be an effort made to at encourage posters to retract or remove lies and factually wrong statements aonce they have been discredited with hard facts, and this should apply more so to mods. I mean, can anyone imagine the BBc not removing ted crevices 'spark plug less ICE' whopper, and that was just ignorance not an intent to decieve.
rant over/ the roth show will be back on air when he finds something else to have a "subtle" dig with but that he doesnt understand