FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#416026
That was payback by Senna for being cheated the year before. Was he correctin what he did, probably not but. I can completely understand Senna.


So you'll completely understand if Kimi takes out Lewis. :hehe:

He's got to get much farther up the grid first. Oh yeah, and be near the championship lead. :rofl:
#416027
I don't think Rosberg cares how he wins.


Rosberg the Ruthless :twisted::twisted::twisted:

More ruthlessness than talent, indeed.
#416030
I don't think Rosberg cares how he wins.


Rosberg the Ruthless :twisted::twisted::twisted:

More ruthlessness than talent, indeed.

101% ruthlessness, 100% talent, $#@! yeah :twisted::twisted::twisted:
#416032
I don't think Rosberg cares how he wins.


Rosberg the Ruthless :twisted::twisted::twisted:

More ruthlessness than talent, indeed.

101% ruthlessness, 100% talent, $#@! yeah :twisted::twisted::twisted:


If he were anything close to 100% talent he wouldn't need to be ruthless( cheaty)
#416033
I don't think Rosberg cares how he wins.


Rosberg the Ruthless :twisted::twisted::twisted:

More ruthlessness than talent, indeed.

101% ruthlessness, 100% talent, $#@! yeah :twisted::twisted::twisted:

100% of a pint don't equal a gallon son.
User avatar
By Roth
#416037
Its to do with fans that watch F1 only for 1 team or driver - Ferrari have this, Lewis has this, MS did not really have this, as you half wittingly pointed out above he was seen as part of Ferrari - if anything he had the opposite effect


What are you basing this on? MS did not really have this? He made Ferrari less attractive? How do you know what part of an audience comprimises the love of one thing and that it's that thing and that thing alone that keeps them watching? It's just whatever pops into your head ends up in the post.
#416043
Its to do with fans that watch F1 only for 1 team or driver - Ferrari have this, Lewis has this, MS did not really have this, as you half wittingly pointed out above he was seen as part of Ferrari - if anything he had the opposite effect


What are you basing this on? MS did not really have this? He made Ferrari less attractive? How do you know what part of an audience comprimises the love of one thing and that it's that thing and that thing alone that keeps them watching? It's just whatever pops into your head ends up in the post.


I am basing this on negative media, questionable behaviour, documented arrogance, Disqualifications from races for CHEATING - audiences turning off in droves due to his arrogance and the race fixes and Reubens crying on the podium etc. I conclude that MS was responsible for certain crowd stopping to watch F1 due to the qualities mentioned above

Lewis on the other hand has brought more brand new fans into F1 just because he started racing

So there you have it, I am basing this on facts, you however have not made any sense or even provided any coherent argument against, it's just whatever pops into your head ends up in the post.

It just hurts you so much that Lewis can be argued to have brought a unique market segment and MS can be argued to have depleted a market segment - and you have ABSOLUTELY no clue of how to refute this - so let that butthurt flow, bite the pillow a little harder next time round :thumbup:
Last edited by CookinFlat6 on 07 Sep 14, 11:48, edited 1 time in total.
#416046
I don't think Rosberg cares how he wins.


Rosberg the Ruthless :twisted::twisted::twisted:

More ruthlessness than talent, indeed.

101% ruthlessness, 100% talent, $#@! yeah :twisted::twisted::twisted:


If he were anything close to 100% talent he wouldn't need to be ruthless( cheaty)


Didn't you say hamilton was ruthless though? I guess if hamilton were anything close to 100% talent he wouldn't need to be ruthless. Your words, not mine.
#416047
I don't think Rosberg cares how he wins.


Rosberg the Ruthless :twisted::twisted::twisted:

More ruthlessness than talent, indeed.

101% ruthlessness, 100% talent, $#@! yeah :twisted::twisted::twisted:

100% of a pint don't equal a gallon son.


100% of a pint does equal a pint though, and apparently that's all anybody needs cuz lewis needs way more than that just to finish a race :rofl::rofl::rofl:
#416049
Didn't you say hamilton was ruthless though? I guess if hamilton were anything close to 100% talent he wouldn't need to be ruthless. Your words, not mine.


Ruthless in racecraft is a different ballgame from ruthless enough to cheat instead. One needs talent, one needs a lack of moral fibre
#416077
We have a pretty weak WDC leader right now.

Even the THOUGHT of going wheel to wheel makes the guy crumble into pieces. Looks like Spa did get to his head and Wolff's words were ringing in his ears the entire time.
#416085
I don't think Rosberg cares how he wins.


Rosberg the Ruthless :twisted::twisted::twisted:

More ruthlessness than talent, indeed.

101% ruthlessness, 100% talent, $#@! yeah :twisted::twisted::twisted:


If he were anything close to 100% talent he wouldn't need to be ruthless( cheaty)


Didn't you say hamilton was ruthless though? I guess if hamilton were anything close to 100% talent he wouldn't need to be ruthless. Your words, not mine.


I qualified which sort of ruthless I meant with the words ( cheaty) in brackets. Ruthlessly quick through traffic is a different thing all together.
  • 1
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 188

See our F1 related articles too!