FORUMula1.com

F1 and Motorsport Forums

Formula One related discussion.
User avatar
By Roth
#410653
Is it supposed to be some sort of revelation, that I even wrote this? You're bringing something up we've already discussed and disagreed on. Do you think bringing it up again will make me reconsider?

I don't see what you're getting at. Well, that's not strictly true, you're saying it was a ridiculous statement and that's why we're irrationally castigating somebody who disagrees with us.

No, you're not saying that either. What are you saying? That I shouldn't write it because it's not true? And it's not true because you say it isn't, because you know better than me?

And that if I try to find articles saying F1 drivers can be affected by stress, just to put it out there that they are human not deitys, it's a lot of psychobabble.

You can't point blank refute my points simply because they don't gel with yours.
#410656
Excuse me... I'm not refuting your enlightened points, I asked merely how they relate to today's events. I politely asked for and was eagerly waiting for your rationale.

You carry on though, I' believe my work here is done. :)
User avatar
By Roth
#410661
What's Burning? wrote:Excuse me... I'm not refuting your enlightened points, I asked merely how they relate to today's events. I politely asked for and was eagerly waiting for your rationale.

You carry on though, I' believe my work here is done. :)
No, you were being sarcastic and making the assumption that I will always find a fault in everything Hamilton does.

Really, just stop typing. You're clearly not stupid, you write interesting posts most of the time, but you don't do needling very well.
#410666
Roth wrote:Is it supposed to be some sort of revelation, that I even wrote this? You're bringing something up we've already discussed and disagreed on. Do you think bringing it up again will make me reconsider?

I don't see what you're getting at. Well, that's not strictly true, you're saying it was a ridiculous statement and that's why we're irrationally castigating somebody who disagrees with us.

No, you're not saying that either. What are you saying? That I shouldn't write it because it's not true? And it's not true because you say it isn't, because you know better than me?

And that if I try to find articles saying F1 drivers can be affected by stress, just to put it out there that they are human not deitys, it's a lot of psychobabble.

You can't point blank refute my points simply because they don't gel with yours.
Nope, but we can ridicule them as we would if you had turned up saying you KNEW that Lewis turned into a werewolf at night, and we should just accept it cos you said so. Actually thats not outlandish enough as saying Lewis has an established mental health issue that means Nico doesnt have to be faster or better to beat him.
Whats really scary is after a race that Lewis then goes from the back to 3rd, you find things like his 'raggedness, desperation and sloppyness' to back up your fairy tale and then a week later when he goes from the pit to 3rd beating the somewhat rattled Nico enroute, you decide your fairy tale is off limits just because and any further discussion would be stopping you from having your own 'opinion'

Ok, you have drawn the line in the sand and basically said 'this is me, thats who I am, let that be my credibility'

So why would you be surprised when you become a byword for F1 fairy tale telling

I am gonna do a Roth - 'Seb has destroyed his teammate psychologically by out qualifying him in Hungary' (anyone pointing out what a load of toss that is based on the evidence is preventing me from saying my opinion, and I want some debate with people who agree and I dont want to be challenged on it and i dont want to be ridiculed and I am going to go on google and find some articles about pyschology and post them - I am sure at least one persons eyes will glaze over with the psychobabble and i will have credibility)

'you cant point blank refute my points because they dont gel with yours'?

nope but I can show its a bunch of toss by producing facts that you have no answer to and wont even address or acknowledge

Roth 'did Lewis show his mental weakness today Yes or No?' - blahdeblahdeblahedementalwekanesspsychobabbleblahbalh

:deadhorse:
User avatar
By sagi58
#410671
Jabberwocky wrote:
What's Burning? wrote:
Roth wrote:Do tell, WB, what are the finer points exactly? Use small words please.
Apparently all you see are Hamilton's limitations and mental inferiority compared to his teammate.
[img] http://www.mikecornelison.com/wp-conten ... people.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; [\img]
:rofl::clap::rofl:

p.s. not sure why the image doesn't load; but, follow the link, it's worth the laugh!! :hehe:
User avatar
By sagi58
#410672
This behaviour is absolutely fascinating!!

It's like being in the school yard and a fight breaks out; but,
when you go looking for a teacher to resolve the issue fairly,
s/he is in the midst of the dispute adding fuel to the fire.

yup... popcorn is in order!
#410677
Adults have arguments and disagreements when they are knowledgeable enough about a sports to have opposing views, even teachers can form their own views

Which forum rules exactly do you believe have been broken or are you saying you dont really understand what they are doing but feel like the participants are doing something :yikes:
#410678
sagi58 wrote:This behaviour is absolutely fascinating!!

It's like being in the school yard and a fight breaks out; but,
when you go looking for a teacher to resolve the issue fairly,
s/he is in the midst of the dispute adding fuel to the fire.

yup... popcorn is in order!
And there's sweet little innocent you putting out the fire with gasoline, eh?
User avatar
By sagi58
#410679
CookinFlat6 wrote:Adults have arguments and disagreements when they are knowledgeable enough about a sports to have opposing views, even teachers can form their own views

Which forum rules exactly do you believe have been broken or are you saying you dont really understand what they are doing but feel like the participants are doing something :yikes:
Adults are respectful. They don't resort to personal attacks, just because of differences of opinions.
They may not be written forum rules; but, that's how a discussion should be conducted.

Sure, emotions will play a part; but, as adults, even those can be kept in check!!
User avatar
By sagi58
#410681
What's Burning? wrote:
sagi58 wrote:This behaviour is absolutely fascinating!!

It's like being in the school yard and a fight breaks out; but,
when you go looking for a teacher to resolve the issue fairly,
s/he is in the midst of the dispute adding fuel to the fire.

yup... popcorn is in order!
And there's sweet little innocent you putting out the fire with gasoline, eh?
You'll have to make up your mind, do you want people who don't agree to stand their ground,
or do you want them to run off with their tails between their legs... Can't have it both ways!
#410682
sagi58 wrote:
What's Burning? wrote:
sagi58 wrote:This behaviour is absolutely fascinating!!

It's like being in the school yard and a fight breaks out; but,
when you go looking for a teacher to resolve the issue fairly,
s/he is in the midst of the dispute adding fuel to the fire.

yup... popcorn is in order!
And there's sweet little innocent you putting out the fire with gasoline, eh?
You'll have to make up your mind, do you want people who don't agree to stand their ground,
or do you want them to run off with their tails between their legs... Can't have it both ways!
No, I just think people should be accountable for the crap that comes out of their mouth Sagi. Unlike you at least Roth is not being hypocritical about the crap he's said.
#410685
And on the Sagi show this evening folks
sagi58 wrote:Adults are respectful. They don't resort to personal attacks, just because of differences of opinions.
They may not be written forum rules; but, that's how a discussion should be conducted.
Adults dont resort to personal attacks (just thermonuclear war once in a while)
sagi58 wrote:Sure, emotions will play a part; but, as adults, even those can be kept in check!!
Emotions can be kept in check (you can buy a gadget in the adult store)
sagi58 wrote:This behaviour is absolutely fascinating!!
!
The fascination in this behaviour (is because the emotion gadget is working perfectly, nothing to do with rubber necking)
sagi58 wrote: do you want people who don't agree to stand their ground,
Do you want people to stand up and show some emotion like fight or flight
sagi58 wrote:or do you want them to run off with their tails between their legs...
Or do you want them to show some emotion like fight or flight
sagi58 wrote: Can't have it both ways!
Nope, you cant but I can, I can contradict myself in each sentence but Im still way smarter than you because I am so subtle

:rolleyes:





Or do you want them
  • 1
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 188
Williams Support

It has been a really disappointing season for them[…]

Austin's F1 circuit.

COTA is one of the best tracks on the calendar, an[…]

Really happy to see Max Verstappen win his first r[…]

McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]

Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!