FORUMula1.com

[Denthúl]

Nice to hear the door is still open. I think it's pretty essential for the US to have a Grand Prix if it's going to bring a new audience to F1. I'd argue against Indianapolis though as the track is bloody awful.

I feel that in order for more Americans to become interested in F1, there need to be two or three races in the US, not just one. After all, the US is a big place, but only held one GP. When you look at Europe, a lot of neighbouring countries hold races, so Europeans have better access to more races, thus creating greater interest.

[Lem]

Nice to hear the door is still open. I think it's pretty essential for the US to have a Grand Prix if it's going to bring a new audience to F1. I'd argue against Indianapolis though as the track is bloody awful.

I feel that in order for more Americans to become interested in F1, there need to be two or three races in the US, not just one. After all, the US is a big place, but only held one GP. When you look at Europe, a lot of neighbouring countries hold races, so Europeans have better access to more races, thus creating greater interest.

Yup, I'd agree with that. Not sure Uncle Bernie would consider it though unless an American driver came and took the sport by storm.

[7UpJordan]

Would Watkins Glen not be suitable? [/no clue]

Track yes, facilities not so much.

If Mr H Tilke had a look at the track he wouldn't think so, he'd then go ahead and ruin the track permanently.

[al4x]

it would be okay for one in the west and one in the east