FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
By LRW
#397483
4. People who have high post counts that are mostly rubbish, have a big impact on numbers of posts dropping when they leave , but no real loss to the forum.


Thats a bit harsh to LRW who just hit 5K posts :wink:


Thats oj RC herself has almost 20k.

;)


:rofl::rofl: but we're still here aren't we :wink:


Just...

#huff.....
#397508
Well even if you look at the traffic on this forum. The last 3 3-4 years has seen the active membership dwindle to what we have now. We used to to have well over 100 posts a day

Sent using NCC-1701


Good point really. Sadly quite a few who made significant and regular contributions.


True, the forum may not be at its all-time peak in terms of posts-per-day, but I think (from memory) the real slump was at this point last year, when race threads were only getting to 8 or 9 pages long, compared to 30-40 we'd seen the previous season.

I believe the forum has got better since, and we have newer regulars like sagi, and looking at the posts per day, they seem to have increased again.

A lot of ex-members of this forum now prefer to use Facebook and twitter to air their views on F1, seeing as their attempt at a rival forum backfired.
User avatar
By Frontrunner
#397545
Don't worry fellow posters, once Lewis and NIco have there massive battle fighting for victory and both crash out, this forum will be buzzing again or go into complete meltdown. :thumbup::hehe:
By CookinFlat6
#397553
Nico will have to be close to him on track for that to happen, but yes it would definitely get everyone coming out of the woodwork to say their piece :hehe:
User avatar
By sagi58
#397599
Don't worry fellow posters, once Lewis and NIco have there massive battle fighting for victory and both crash out, this forum will be buzzing again or go into complete meltdown. :thumbup::hehe:

I'll bet on both happening simultaneously! :wink:
User avatar
By darwin dali
#397600
We haven't been posting much Ourselves - Her Majesty, the Queen, has been tending to other business, so this might explain why there weren't 100 posts a day.
User avatar
By sagi58
#397603
I hear you DD! I make plans to do all sorts of things; but, then Life interferes!
The difference in time zones also makes it difficult to participate, unless your
job/profession means you're working on a computer.
By g4racer
#397614
The rules being made have little to do with racing compared to a PR Program put in place by a business. How many times since its inception has reducing drag, if 1 second or less behind the car leading you, had an effect on the outcome of an event. I guess it is possible for a car/driver .99 seconds per lap slower than the fastest driver could win the race if they were 2nd when hitting the last zone on the last lap.
Changing Specs ever few years doesn't help the new teams but the teams with the largest budgets. We can go back to the time when MB was a force over half a century ago and compare the price of building a car. Most teams that ran F1 are no longer around; but MB spent more per car than anyone else and by a factor of 3 or 4.
F1 is a business first and a race group second. I found the racing to be much more 40 to 60 years ago interesting than it is today. I miss seeing teams like BRM, Vanwall and Cooper. The sounds of the different allowed you to know which car it was. The cars were different, the sounds were different and the drivers were much different.
At least this weekend I can try to sleep normal hours as I prefer to see the events live.
User avatar
By bud
#397615
Oh I am so glad you can sleep normal hours, for you are far more important than anyone else.
Ignore the fact I will watch it live at 2am while starting work at 8am. Get over yourself <EDITED FOR CONTENT>!
User avatar
By racechick
#397619
The rules being made have little to do with racing compared to a PR Program put in place by a business. How many times since its inception has reducing drag, if 1 second or less behind the car leading you, had an effect on the outcome of an event. I guess it is possible for a car/driver .99 seconds per lap slower than the fastest driver could win the race if they were 2nd when hitting the last zone on the last lap.
Changing Specs ever few years doesn't help the new teams but the teams with the largest budgets. We can go back to the time when MB was a force over half a century ago and compare the price of building a car. Most teams that ran F1 are no longer around; but MB spent more per car than anyone else and by a factor of 3 or 4.
F1 is a business first and a race group second. I found the racing to be much more 40 to 60 years ago interesting than it is today. I miss seeing teams like BRM, Vanwall and Cooper. The sounds of the different allowed you to know which car it was. The cars were different, the sounds were different and the drivers were much different.
At least this weekend I can try to sleep normal hours as I prefer to see the events live.


Hello g4racer :wavey: welcome to the forum. It sounds as though you have a rich history of GP watching.......hope you'll share some of your stories with us. I'm appallingly bad at acronyms, who are MB?

I agree with much of what you say, F1 is big business and silly decisions get made because of that, which interfere with pure racing.....last years tyres being a recent and prime example. I think this year we are better off despite there still being some issues, and I think that because the cars now require more driver skill....they are harder to drive, which I like to see. The drivers are limited by their ability to get traction down and control it rather than by a tyre that blows up if you drive too fast.
Though there are strict rules in place for what you can and can't do, we have some very clever engineers , and so we still see big differences in how those rules are interpreted, and therefore in now fast the cars go. In a way the engineers have to be even clevere to extract an advantage when the rules are so prescriptive. And whilst money clearly helps develop a fast car it isn't the only factor. RBR, Ferrari and Mercedes all have a big budget and Ron Dennis said recently that the budget for the McLaren F1 team is the biggest it's had in its history. And yet amongst those four teams...eight cars, we see differences.
It's still f1, it's what we've got and I love it. I think it's easy to remember the past with rose tinted glasses. The good bits stick out but the bad bits we forget.

On viewing tImes. I don't care when it's on I'll watch. I think having decided to run a race in a certain country( not always wise choices in my view) then it is curtesy to that country to run it at the same time as it is usually run. 1pm local time.

Welcome again g4 racer. I hope we hear more from you :)
By Hammer278
#397621
The rules being made have little to do with racing compared to a PR Program put in place by a business. How many times since its inception has reducing drag, if 1 second or less behind the car leading you, had an effect on the outcome of an event. I guess it is possible for a car/driver .99 seconds per lap slower than the fastest driver could win the race if they were 2nd when hitting the last zone on the last lap.
Changing Specs ever few years doesn't help the new teams but the teams with the largest budgets. We can go back to the time when MB was a force over half a century ago and compare the price of building a car. Most teams that ran F1 are no longer around; but MB spent more per car than anyone else and by a factor of 3 or 4.
F1 is a business first and a race group second. I found the racing to be much more 40 to 60 years ago interesting than it is today. I miss seeing teams like BRM, Vanwall and Cooper. The sounds of the different allowed you to know which car it was. The cars were different, the sounds were different and the drivers were much different.
At least this weekend I can try to sleep normal hours as I prefer to see the events live.


Wow it sounds like you started watching the sport since its inception? :eek:

Interesting post indeed, hope you stick around! :thumbup:
By g4racer
#397658
I got to drive an F2 car in 1959, not race, just took it out on track. After MGTD's and a 100-M Healey it was an experience. I see the interest in racing has dropped, not just F1 but what we called Sports Cars. Things just seemed to go downhill in the mid 1970s.
Practice 3 is over:
2 driver did over 20 laps
6 between 15 and 19
10 between 10 and 14
4 did 9 or less
In dry weather these are the lowest numbers I've ever seen.

https://video.search.yahoo.com/video/pl ... ge=0&&tt=b

A nice thing to watch
#397686
There's a reason for that, actually two. They tested here twice this year so they know setup. They're also saving PUs. They have to last a lot longer now.
By Hammer278
#397730
........... I'm appallingly bad at acronyms, who are MB?......


Oh RC, you are so silly sometimes.....

:wink:


Lol....rc, it's a team in f1. take a guess, you have 3.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7

See our F1 related articles too!