- 22 Mar 14, 22:28#396182
My original thought was they had no chance with their appeal. But one recent claim I read was that they will show that the flow rates reported by the FiA supplied sensor indicate the used more fuel than they could possibly have on car. If true, and the sensor was genuinely faulty then they may have a good and reasonable case.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk
"He was the fastest driver I ever saw - faster even than Fangio"
________________________- Mike Hawthorn on Alberto Ascari
I don't think they'll be successful in the appeal, I feel it might be more a case of RBR wanting to show up the inaccuracies of the sensors and wanting something done about that.
My original thought was they had no chance with their appeal. But one recent claim I read was that they will show that the flow rates reported by the FiA supplied sensor indicate the used more fuel than they could possibly have on car. If true, and the sensor was genuinely faulty then they may have a good and reasonable case.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk

"He was the fastest driver I ever saw - faster even than Fangio"
________________________- Mike Hawthorn on Alberto Ascari