- 08 Apr 08, 07:01#39193
Nice clarification for those who wanted to know mate
.
I'll explain why I do the FIAt thing, but only once (as if anyone here cares).
It's simply a device to highlight the fact that Ecclestone, Mosely and the FIA, and of course (well why would they not, any advantage should be taken) Ferrari have a vested interest in promoting, and over the recent past maintaining, Ferrari dominance BY WHATEVER MEANS POSSIBLE.
I believe (and of course its only my belief) that this is detremental to the SPORT of top flight motor racing while conversly being hugely profitable for those vested interests. I don't conform to the view that "Whats good for Ferrari is good for F1", the trickle down effect is a dubious concept and certainly benifited Minardi, Stewart, Jordon, Prost, Midland etc etc very little.
So, as its too much hassle to write Ecclestone/Mosely/FIA/Ferrari, I just write FIAt.
I am as much in awe of Ferrari (both Enzo and post Enzo) as any real race fan but FIAt can kiss my ar##.
As far as I'm concerned until Max goes and the FIA cleans it's act up, until Bernie stops pulling the strings behind the scenes and until Ferrari have the balls to admit the collusion, it's a FIAt.
Nice clarification for those who wanted to know mate

"Sanity and happiness are an impossible combination".
Mark Twain
Mark Twain