FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Just as it says...
#392538
Ferrari powers on as world's most powerful brand


Ferrari announces record profits as the Italian car maker is named the most powerful global brand for the second year running

By Michael Harvey
February 19, 2014 10:12

Ferrari’s new single-seater will be pounding around the Sakhir International Circuit in Bahrain this week in preparation for the new Grand Prix season starting in March. Testing of the new car has so far been promising. The car is reliable (which, given complex new engines is not a given this year) and fast. Ish. Maybe not quite as fast as Lewis Hamilton’s new Mercedes or Jenson Button’s new McLaren but fast enough, Ferrari will hope, to give Fernando Alonso and the returning Kimi Raikkonen a crack at the title this year. Maybe.

Image

Not that actually winning seems to bother the bottom line anymore. Ferrari has announced record profits and, separately, was named world’s most powerful brand by the consultants Brand Finance.

Brand Finance uses a complex and sometimes impenetrable formula to come to its conclusion, with data harvested from numerous external sources on everything from marketing spend to trademark protection, CEO performance to employee satisfaction, and "sentiment index", measuring the emotional component of the brand itself. There are 37 data lines in all and Ferrari scores 94 per cent, putting itself ahead of Coca-Cola, PricewaterhouseCoopers, McKinsey & Company and, in ninth place, its racing nemesis Red Bull. For reference, fellow Telegraph Luxury regulars Hermes and Rolex finished seventh and eighth among the list of powerful brands.

Brand power and brand value are of course different things and the value chart is headed, as is traditional now, by Apple, with Samsung closing in and ahead of Google and Microsoft. Toyota (11) and BMW (17) are the most valuable cars brands; Ferrari’s US$4 billion brand valuation puts it way down the value list in 350, but that’s a factor of its tiny productions (6,922 Ferrari’s were delivered to dealers last year versus Toyota’s 9.9 million).

Ferrari production was actually down last year, by just over five per cent, but this was always the plan. Since record sales in 2012 the company’s strategy has been to increase the value of its products by limiting their numbers. Just take a look at the comparative value of Ferrari’s classic cars to appreciate this simple lesson in supply and demand: the more rare the model, the more stratospheric price it fetches.

Accordingly, Ferrari’s turnover increased last year as did its profits at €246million. As a result Ferrari now has €1.36billion cash at hand and no debt. It’s a remarkable figure for a luxury car maker, let alone one who has completely reinvented itself and in the process rebuilt most all of its R&D and production facilities over the last decade.

Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo, the architect of Ferrari’s successful strategy, said: "This is a very important result that comes as a direct consequence of the huge effort made by everyone. We wanted to maintain a high level of exclusivity, designing amazing products such as the LaFerrari, the 458 Speciale and the just launched California T, the result of significant investment in product and technological innovation."

He went on: "We have also taken important strategic decisions relating to the brand which will make an ever increasing contribution to the success of the company," referring to a new wholly-owned business that will control the non-automotive activities of the company. Fast cars however are still Ferrari’s line of business, the "brand related activities" accounted for just €53 million of a total of €2.3billion revenues last year.

Ferrari will soon begin deliveries of its most expensive car yet, the astonishing V12-electric LaFerrari hybrid of which just 499 will be built. All were sold before the car made its public debut. Last week the company announced its first turbocharged car in over 30 years, the California T.

Both the hybrid powertrain in the LaFerrari and the turbocharger in the new California are designed to reduce emissions and improve efficiency, part of a green wave that’s even seen the F1 rules rewritten improve the mpg of F1 cars by no less than 30 per cent. Bloomberg scored Ferrari ahead of its peers for its environmental performance in the Brand Finance report, though I suspect that will be less on the minds of Messers Alonso and Raikkonen this week than the new F-14T’s outright speed. Ferrari’s requirement for its racing cars to finish first may be reduced, but it won’t stop them trying.

Ferrari
http://www.ferrari.com
#392542
Congratulations to Ferrari!

But what does the most powerful brand actually mean? When you look at the bottom line, there are companies (which also have brands) that make 4 billion in profits a day. That's pretty powerful if you ask me. Hope this doesn't turn into another twitter follower debate.
#392545
Congratulations to Ferrari!

But what does the most powerful brand actually mean? When you look at the bottom line, there are companies (which also have brands) that make 4 billion in profits a day. That's pretty powerful if you ask me. Hope this doesn't turn into another twitter follower debate.


Please not another one of those stuck record threads :rolleyes:

Here's a description of how they arrive at their conclusion "Brand Finance uses a complex and sometimes impenetrable formula to come to its conclusion, with data harvested from numerous external sources on everything from marketing spend to trademark protection, CEO performance to employee satisfaction, and "sentiment index", measuring the emotional component of the brand itself. There are 37 data lines in all and Ferrari scores 94 per cent"

There website also lists the world's most valuable brands, and Ferrari is nowhere to be seen on the front page of that one :)
#392549
:blush: Thanks for pointing me to the site, yes, they do comment and it certainly in line with my (sometimes rigidly logical) line of thinking. In the end though Spanky, you realize that the cache to the brand is inexorably tied to its racing history and pedigree which makes it even more ridonkulous whenever they threaten to leave F1. :hehe:
#392553
:blush: Thanks for pointing me to the site, yes, they do comment and it certainly in line with my (sometimes rigidly logical) line of thinking. In the end though Spanky, you realize that the cache to the brand is inexorably tied to its racing history and pedigree which makes it even more ridonkulous whenever they threaten to leave F1. :hehe:


They won't leave F1 while it is the premier, leading edge motor racing sport. But, even you would have to acknowledge that F1 is being driven to be "affordable" and "restricted" with the desire to have global family car makers instead of the traditional marquee brands.
#392554
:blush: Thanks for pointing me to the site, yes, they do comment and it certainly in line with my (sometimes rigidly logical) line of thinking. In the end though Spanky, you realize that the cache to the brand is inexorably tied to its racing history and pedigree which makes it even more ridonkulous whenever they threaten to leave F1. :hehe:


They won't leave F1 while it is the premier, leading edge motor racing sport. But, even you would have to acknowledge that F1 is being driven to be "affordable" and "restricted" with the desire to have global family car makers instead of the traditional marquee brands.

I don't know about that, I can see why you'd choose to see it that way but given the technology and given the manufacturing capabilities why would we progress making the entire sport more efficient. Would you doubt that the speeds of the given cars would go through the roof is we simply used the same engines and just gave the engineers more design leeway with the rest of the car?

We don't see airplanes with radial air cooled engines any more, technology moves on and manufacturing capabilities move on, might as well bitch about the use of carbon fiber instead of good old aluminum tub construction. One day we might even see F1 running a hydrogen engine, and yeah we'll all be nostalgic, but I'm all for going forward first.
#392557
....One day we might even see F1 running a hydrogen engine, and yeah we'll all be nostalgic, but I'm all for going forward first.


I'm all for going forward. I just don't think budgets and restrictions to attract Kia and Tata is not my idea of going forward.
#392579
"Brand Finance uses a complex and sometimes impenetrable formula to come to its conclusion, with data harvested from numerous external sources on everything from marketing spend to trademark protection, CEO performance to employee satisfaction, and "sentiment index", measuring the emotional component of the brand itself. There are 37 data lines in all and Ferrari scores 94 per cent"

I'm on record, a number of times, questioning how statistics have been gathered.
It was good to see that this "title" was given to Ferrari based on verifiable data
that was scientifically gathered from a variety of pertinent sources.

So, hats off Image to everyone at Ferrari!! :clap:
#392590
and "sentiment index", measuring the emotional component of the brand itself


Thats sounds really cutting edge scientific methodology, It wasnt an Italian company by any chance? :hehe:

But hats off to Ferrari, they are truly a great brand, I am not sure as valuable or successful as say Coca Cola but they have made some fantastic cars in the past :thumbup:
#392591
The Testerossa and F50 Spider, timeless IMO. The new ones just don't do it for me.
#392592
The "sentiment index" was one of 36, interesting that you'd hone in on "one" and assume it was an Italian company.

and "sentiment index", measuring the emotional component of the brand itself


Thats sounds really cutting edge scientific methodology, It wasnt an Italian company by any chance? :hehe:


I guess you haven't heard about just how scientific the process of accumulating data for a "sentiment index" analysis actually is:

 wrote:">Definition of 'Sentiment Indicator'

A graphical or numerical indicator designed to show how a group feels about the market, business environment or other factor. A sentiment indicator seeks to quantify how various factors, such as unemployment, inflation, macroeconomic conditions or politics influence future behavior.

Sentiment indicators can be used by investors to see how optimistic or pessimistic people are to current market conditions. For example, a consumer sentiment index that shows pessimism may make companies less likely to stock up on inventory, because they may fear that consumers will not spend.

p.s. I'll ignore the racist comment/derision of the Italian tradition for being an emotional culture!
#392626
Your info just tells us how sentiment indicators are used, not how they are compiled. :thumbup:

They are compiled by only one way. A survey of a sample of people who are asked simply how they feel about the subject - optimistc, fairly optimistic, pessimistic etc. In finance sentiment indicators poll business managers or purchasing managers and are frequently inaccurate when unexpected events happen.

The reference to an Italian company was simply because Ferrari is Italian and if the company carrying out the poll polled the sentiment of an Italian based sample then my point is that the scientific grounding that you claim is slightly eroded.

I really do not know where you got rascist stuff from. Please read what I just wrote in this post carefully and consider retracting that comment

See our F1 related articles too!