FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
User avatar
By sagi58
#392359
I'm more adventurous than you :D

I'm probably more ""stupid-stitious"" than you!! Believe me, if I were to say:
... I can say for sure that we are toward the top and that we have a good basis to build our year on...

I would just jinx the whole season!! :banghead:
User avatar
By sagi58
#392518
Day 4 in Bahrain:

 wrote:">Anche la Ferrari F14 T ha bisogno di aria?

...Il finlandese sta lavorando alacremente sulla definizione dei singoli dettagli, mentre porta avanti lo sviluppo delle gomme. La Ferrari ha usato Pirelli con mescola medie e soft, senza cercare i tempi con una configurazione da qualifica come ha fatto stamattina Nico Rosberg, prima di iniziare la simulazione di gara.

The Finn was working hard on defining individual details, while working on tire development. Ferrari used PIrelli's medium and soft compounds, to do a race simulation without setting times using a qualification setup, like Nico Roberg did this morning.

(( p.s. How'd I do, DD? :thumbup: ))
#392635
Day 4 in Bahrain:

 wrote:">Anche la Ferrari F14 T ha bisogno di aria?

...Il finlandese sta lavorando alacremente sulla definizione dei singoli dettagli, mentre porta avanti lo sviluppo delle gomme. La Ferrari ha usato Pirelli con mescola medie e soft, senza cercare i tempi con una configurazione da qualifica come ha fatto stamattina Nico Rosberg, prima di iniziare la simulazione di gara.

The Finn was working hard on defining individual details, while working on tire development. Ferrari used PIrelli's medium and soft compounds, to do a race simulation without setting times using a qualification setup, like Nico Roberg did this morning.

(( p.s. How'd I do, DD? :thumbup: ))

Who's Roberg?
User avatar
By sagi58
#392655
Who's Roberg?

Rosberg... :banghead:

Oddly enough, the site made the error, which I corrected in the quote,
only to make the same mistake, myself!! :blush:

Good eye!! :thumbup:
#392658
Who's Roberg?

Rosberg... :banghead:

Oddly enough, the site made the error, which I corrected in the quote,
only to make the same mistake, myself!! :blush:

Good eye!! :thumbup:

:theeye:
#394218
This is rather lengthy, but an excellent watch!

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/k3RAV6 ... Xl?start=0

Engine first fired up on 15th April 2013. They certainly kept that very quiet.

On 2013 it's clear there were two things that took us out of the title fight. 1st our wind tunnel correlations and 2nd the mid-season rule change to tires to help Red Bull and Mercedes.
#396104
I'm really happy about the race result from Australia. I don't understand the gloom from some Tifosi. Consider all the good points that came from our first race.

We were a long way behind Mercedes in terms of development on the PU and car yet we were competitive all weekend.
Both cars finished.
Both cars had electrical problems that seriously effected both performance and fuel economy.
I really believe we may be leading in terms of most fuel efficiency. I say this because we stayed on our pace the whole race, our drivers weren't asked to go into fuel savings mode - but we did hear the Mercedes powered cars being told to save fuel. Also, we would have used more fuel than planned because of our electrical problem.
Our cars "looks" to me to be the best in the high speed aero sections - this is a really big plus and is why I believe we were able to keep up with other cars even though we were clearly significantly down on power in Melbourne.
Problems that we need to sort out are obviously our electrical problems (I think this will be purely software changes), also our traction out of low speed corners and our brake by wire definitely needs attention.
I'm really looking forward to the next few races and feel we can definitely harvest very good points while, with a working wind tunnel we can build usable and valuable updates for the car. We also have a lot more than most teams in terms of setup improvements siply because we were so far behind after the pre-season testing.
For me we have a really good and competitive car and we have the best drivers so there is a lot to happy about.
Forza Ferrari

ImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
By sagi58
#396213
I agree with the technical improvements you've posted, spanky;
but, for me, the team morale/spirit is just as important.

Alonso looks happier, sounds happier than he did last year, in
spite of the good start we had, then. Kimi is talking... I mean,
he is actually talking to the media! Huge improvement for me!!

ImageImage
#397302
I've been thinking about the first two races of the season and where we are.

Stating the obvious, we are not as fast as the leaders. Right now I think we are behind Mercedes (the clear leaders) and Red Bull. Very close to us are Williams and McLaren.

My first observation is that we have a really top chassis and our overall aero package is also very good. I'd also say that our car has great potential - I do think we will see steady improvements in the car.

I don't think much will come to Bahrain by way of new parts, and I think that this track will suit the Merc powered cars, so it makes it even more important for us to harvest as many points as possible this weekend. I'm sure that's the thinking of the team.

We clearly need to improve our cornering low speed traction. This needs to come from a combination of mechanical grip improvements and engine torque management. I don't think these will be very difficult.

The biggest problem we face, IMO, comes from within the PU. And I don't think it's hard to understand why. Firstly we need to understand that the PU has been greatly changed with these new 2014 regulations. The single biggest problem area for the team is that the PU is not an ICE. Having watched the Malaysian race again, and having paid very close attention to the fuel usage and different in-car views quite a few things make sense to me.

I doubt I will find many who will intrinsically agree with this, but my feeling is that Ferrari's ICE is possibly the best in the field - both in terms of fuel management and power. I'm quite sure, that, if we only consider the ICE, then Ferrari will not be behind either Mercedes or Renault. Given that, why is Ferrari so far down on power compared to both Merc and Renault? This is our area of biggest weakness - the MGU's (particularly the MGU-K) and the ES. We are clearly significantly down here. This also makes perfect sense. Whilst Ferrari has great strength and knowledge in ICE's (albiet normally aspirated ICE's) we have almost zero background knowledge in the electrical power sections of the engines. These parts of the rules were specifically written for the production car industry to keep those involved and possibly attract others. So where both Merc and Renault have great depth in the electrical power side (this has for a long time been part of their production). So Ferrari start a very long way behind in the PU area.

If the above has some merit then where does that leave the team? Well, I think its not that bad. We are only two races into a long season. Very significant improvements can be made very quickly here. Perhaps as soon as Spain. What is best is that the team accepts this advantage that was served up to opposition and simply has a determination to overcome it and eventually be the leader.

Mercedes deserves to be the clear current leader - they took their advantage and made the most of it.

However, many Mercedes fans in general, and the Mercedes fans here have, two races into the season, completely written off Ferrari and already crowned themselves with the 2014 WDC and WCC. A little premature IMO. One thing this self proclaiming has achieved is to push me firmly behind Red Bull for whatever of this season we don't have the winning car. Remember Dan is an Australian of Italian heritage who is on the record as having "dreamed of driving for Ferrari" :D
#397306
Very objective and unbiased :P


You read it? :clap:
#397311
Very objective and unbiased :P


You read it? :clap:

Of course, honey :wink:


You're just happy cause I've backed Red Bull :hehe:
#397312
Very objective and unbiased :P


You read it? :clap:

Of course, honey :wink:


You're just happy cause I've backed Red Bull :hehe:

Nah, not a team fan.
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 10

See our F1 related articles too!