- 21 Feb 14, 02:08#392173
A racing car that does not win, is just art
Infiniti engines for RBR in 15
Sent using NCC-1701
Sent using NCC-1701

A racing car that does not win, is just art
F1 and Motorsport Forums

On [img]https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRz6iuBoCVgre3W5ne1rKj5vGvJC1j_YRKsQ41SvsvshR7FbvJ8pKG0lQU[/img]GMM wrote:http://grandprix247.com/2014/02/17/ferrari-engine-uses-clever-method-to-save-fuel/
...It has also emerged that Renault may not be prevented from fixing its obvious technical problems once the development ‘freeze’ deadline passes, in just over a week.
“There is a ‘fair and equitable’ rule which gives us the opportunity to change any of the components if we have reliability problems,” said Renault Sport’s Remi Taffin.
“I have to say, however, that we do not have big problems with the parts, as we have done successful tests on the dynamometer. We just have to make them all work together.”
After the agony of defeat, success will be sweet!On [img]https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT5n0mL9fAnFApisU8zBBCYHe_snBcy20ZTT8y3b8PtSYD9mGqfDpco0A[/img] Edd Straw wrote:Energy recovery contributing to Renault F1 test issues, says Horner
...Horner believes that former Renault team principal Flavio Briatore's decision that his team (now Lotus) rather than the French manufacturer itself should develop KERS originally is at the heart of the struggles.
While this was a logical move at the time, it was decided when such systems were less complex and could be bolted onto existing engines, meaning that Renault has less experience than it otherwise would in this area.
"If you look at the situation at Renault, Flavio made the decision years ago that energy recover and KERS would be dealt with by the race team, not the engine manufacturer.
"Renault then sold the race team and we picked up KERS and developed our own system that we ran within the gearbox.
"Now, on the new powertrain, energy recovery has gone back to being the responsibility of the engine supplier, which is where it should sit but they have had a steeper learning curve than perhaps Mercedes or Ferrari who have a few years of experience."...
After the agony of defeat, success will be sweet!

CookinFlat6 wrote:That could mean RBR are yet to complete laps in a 2014 legal carAs far as I know only 2 teams (Mercedes and Ferrari) are running the camera mountings on the front of the chassis near the nose, meaning that by default everyone else isn't running a legal car, but I can't imagine they make a huge performance difference anyway.
1Lemon wrote:Teams have options on where to mount there cameras.CookinFlat6 wrote:That could mean RBR are yet to complete laps in a 2014 legal carAs far as I know only 2 teams (Mercedes and Ferrari) are running the camera mountings on the front of the chassis near the nose, meaning that by default everyone else isn't running a legal car, but I can't imagine they make a huge performance difference anyway.

1Lemon wrote:The camera mountings are legit, they are just aerodynamically handy, like McLarens suspension.CookinFlat6 wrote:That could mean RBR are yet to complete laps in a 2014 legal carAs far as I know only 2 teams (Mercedes and Ferrari) are running the camera mountings on the front of the chassis near the nose, meaning that by default everyone else isn't running a legal car, but I can't imagine they make a huge performance difference anyway.

LRW wrote:Maybe none..........racechick wrote:I wonder how much truth there is in this? .....None.
LRW wrote:What you have inside information LRW? You kept that one quiet!racechick wrote:Nop, 100% none.LRW wrote:Maybe none..........racechick wrote:I wonder how much truth there is in this? .....None.
McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]
Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!