- 18 Jan 14, 00:28#387935
2014 Monster 26x Bookie Mugger
2015, 2016 WDC: LH44
Well, you did ask the question, maybe you should have also supplied the answer you wanted to hear at the same time

2014 Monster 26x Bookie Mugger
2015, 2016 WDC: LH44
Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
Well, you did ask the question, maybe you should have also supplied the answer you wanted to hear at the same time
Not necessarily bad news here for McLaren fans. I remember one of Ferrari's most successful cars failed its first FiA crash test - (maybe F2004?). This may also indicate that McLaren are pushing to the absolute limit.
Not necessarily bad news here for McLaren fans. I remember one of Ferrari's most successful cars failed its first FiA crash test - (maybe F2004?). This may also indicate that McLaren are pushing to the absolute limit.
I'm not sure there can be any parallel. Firstly McLaren started the 29 very early, secondly this is not a normal crash test of a car evolved from the previous year- it's a brand new car so they should be even more ready for the basic tests
What's most worthy is reports that the team has failed several times and there is no guarantee it can pass
So like last year they may not even know what they have done wrong or are unable to change it as it's integral
The fact Ron is back just before the launch suggests Whitmarsh again gambling and hoping for the best and has completely screwed up
I prefer a realistic interpretation whether positive or negative, and at this moment Cookin's thinking sounds very plausible to me.
F1 could also do with a strong Ferrari.
F1 could also do with a strong Ferrari.
If being 2nd 3 of the last 4 years isn't strong enough then maybe we agree on something. Ergo we can both feel F1 is better off with Ferrari going one better than 2nd
See our F1 related articles too!