FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
User avatar
By bud
#38335
again monetary gains are different for both drivers, shall we have both drivers on the same salary? thats fair! isnt that what you guys are whinging about? fairness?

so what if one day Lewis asked Ron if he could buy the LM Mac to his reply its not for sale but you can have it if you win the title for us.
You know handshake deal, big deal! and if Heikki said i want that car too if i win the title are you suggesting Ron would say no?
if you are saying Ron would say No to Heikki, youre basing that on a biased view against Ron. which youve shown alot on here.

so who really has the unbiased view here Mike? :wink:
By Mikep99
#38341
again monetary gains are different for both drivers, shall we have both drivers on the same salary? thats fair! isnt that what you guys are whinging about? fairness?

so what if one day Lewis asked Ron if he could buy the LM Mac to his reply its not for sale but you can have it if you win the title for us.
You know handshake deal, big deal! and if Heikki said i want that car too if i win the title are you suggesting Ron would say no?
if you are saying Ron would say No to Heikki, youre basing that on a biased view against Ron. which youve shown alot on here.

so who really has the unbiased view here Mike? :wink:


Bud your way off the mark mate, nikon133 explained what the problem here is perfectly so I don’t have to add anything.

But being me I will add that this perfectly explains the Hammy – Ron relationship.


Image

But they take turns,the positions are interchangeable & its plain to see. :wink:
User avatar
By texasmr2
#38342
again monetary gains are different for both drivers, shall we have both drivers on the same salary? thats fair! isnt that what you guys are whinging about? fairness?

so what if one day Lewis asked Ron if he could buy the LM Mac to his reply its not for sale but you can have it if you win the title for us.
You know handshake deal, big deal! and if Heikki said i want that car too if i win the title are you suggesting Ron would say no?
if you are saying Ron would say No to Heikki, youre basing that on a biased view against Ron. which youve shown alot on here.

so who really has the unbiased view here Mike? :wink:


Bud your way off the mark mate, nikon133 explained what the problem here is perfectly so I don’t have to add anything.

But being me I will add that this perfectly explains the Hammy – Ron relationship.


Image

But they take turns,the positions are interchangeable & its plain to see. :wink:

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!! THAT'S AWESOME!!!! :lol::lol::lol::lol:
#38343
again monetary gains are different for both drivers, shall we have both drivers on the same salary? thats fair! isnt that what you guys are whinging about? fairness?

so what if one day Lewis asked Ron if he could buy the LM Mac to his reply its not for sale but you can have it if you win the title for us.
You know handshake deal, big deal! and if Heikki said i want that car too if i win the title are you suggesting Ron would say no?
if you are saying Ron would say No to Heikki, youre basing that on a biased view against Ron. which youve shown alot on here.

so who really has the unbiased view here Mike? :wink:


Bud your way off the mark mate, nikon133 explained what the problem here is perfectly so I don’t have to add anything.

But being me I will add that this perfectly explains the Hammy – Ron relationship.


Image

But they take turns,the positions are interchangeable & its plain to see. :wink:



I'm laughing tears Mike!! Don't do that again man, I can't stop laughing... :mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen:
User avatar
By bud
#38344
again monetary gains are different for both drivers, shall we have both drivers on the same salary? thats fair! isnt that what you guys are whinging about? fairness?

so what if one day Lewis asked Ron if he could buy the LM Mac to his reply its not for sale but you can have it if you win the title for us.
You know handshake deal, big deal! and if Heikki said i want that car too if i win the title are you suggesting Ron would say no?
if you are saying Ron would say No to Heikki, youre basing that on a biased view against Ron. which youve shown alot on here.

so who really has the unbiased view here Mike? :wink:


Bud your way off the mark mate, nikon133 explained what the problem here is perfectly so I don’t have to add anything.

But being me I will add that this perfectly explains the Hammy – Ron relationship.


Image

But they take turns,the positions are interchangeable & its plain to see. :wink:


yeah ofcourse you wouldnt listen to reason eh ;) whats wrong with my theory??? can you discount it please!!
Ron and Lewis meh tired of this crap you lambs sing. Either McLaren have no Passion a cold environment yet when there is a hint of a family and passion in the McLaren team you guys jump on that and claim unfair.

i mean ffs look at your own beloved teams cheaqured history of team orders and favouritism i would stfu real quick in order to stop making yourself look like you have double standards and reek of hypocricy! :)

as for that pic, i saw that as Ferrari and the FIA more so, i bet deep down your trembling at the knees with your money man max about to dissapear :lol:
User avatar
By texasmr2
#38345
again monetary gains are different for both drivers, shall we have both drivers on the same salary? thats fair! isnt that what you guys are whinging about? fairness?

so what if one day Lewis asked Ron if he could buy the LM Mac to his reply its not for sale but you can have it if you win the title for us.
You know handshake deal, big deal! and if Heikki said i want that car too if i win the title are you suggesting Ron would say no?
if you are saying Ron would say No to Heikki, youre basing that on a biased view against Ron. which youve shown alot on here.

so who really has the unbiased view here Mike? :wink:


Bud your way off the mark mate, nikon133 explained what the problem here is perfectly so I don’t have to add anything.

But being me I will add that this perfectly explains the Hammy – Ron relationship.


Image

But they take turns,the positions are interchangeable & its plain to see. :wink:


yeah ofcourse you wouldnt listen to reason eh ;) whats wrong with my theory??? can you discount it please!!
Ron and Lewis meh tired of this crap you lambs sing. Either McLaren have no Passion a cold environment yet when there is a hint of a family and passion in the McLaren team you guys jump on that and claim unfair.

i mean ffs look at your own beloved teams cheaqured history of team orders and favouritism i would stfu real quick in order to stop making yourself look like you have double standards and reek of hypocricy! :)

as for that pic, i saw that as Ferrari and the FIA more so, i bet deep down your trembling at the knees with your money man max about to dissapear :lol:


haha abit touchy lately mate :mrgreen:
User avatar
By nikon133
#38349
again monetary gains are different for both drivers, shall we have both drivers on the same salary? thats fair! isnt that what you guys are whinging about? fairness?

so what if one day Lewis asked Ron if he could buy the LM Mac to his reply its not for sale but you can have it if you win the title for us.
You know handshake deal, big deal! and if Heikki said i want that car too if i win the title are you suggesting Ron would say no?
if you are saying Ron would say No to Heikki, youre basing that on a biased view against Ron. which youve shown alot on here.

so who really has the unbiased view here Mike? :wink:


No we don't. Contract with both drivers (including all financial details) was made before the season starts. At that point LH was well known and proved quantity everyone knew of being capable to deliver top results. Heiki is unknown entity and it is only logical that no one wants to overpay for "cat in the bag".

But contracts aside (and we do agree car is not part of the contract), everything drivers achieve - and get extra rewarded - during the championship should be valued equally.

And if Heiki wins championship - or finishes with higher points than LH - of course his next contract should be fat as. Or fattier. But car is extra reward for achievement, and not offering same reward for both drivers is basically saying that Heiki's achievements are not valued and important for the team as LH's; he can win the championship but hey, it's not the same because he is not LH..? :roll:
User avatar
By bud
#38351
Nikon answer these questions

A. did Heikki ask for the car?

B. if he did would Ron tell him to piss off?


look past all the crap and these are the underlying factors to take in.
By Mikep99
#38353
yeah ofcourse you wouldnt listen to reason eh ;) whats wrong with my theory??? can you discount it please!!
Ron and Lewis meh tired of this crap you lambs sing. Either McLaren have no Passion a cold environment yet when there is a hint of a family and passion in the McLaren team you guys jump on that and claim unfair.

i mean ffs look at your own beloved teams cheaqured history of team orders and favouritism i would stfu real quick in order to stop making yourself look like you have double standards and reek of hypocricy! :)

as for that pic, i saw that as Ferrari and the FIA more so, i bet deep down your trembling at the knees with your money man max about to dissapear :lol:



:lol::lol: You take everything so so serious mate.
Usually this happens when ones beliefs are rocked to the core.
I think you may have had a few too many knocks on the head mate. :wink:

Image
User avatar
By bud
#38354
I think you may have had a few too many knocks on the head mate. :wink:

says the rugby player :twisted: come to think of it that doggy picture you posted may be you in your teams scrum :mrgreen:
By Mikep99
#38355
I think you may have had a few too many knocks on the head mate. :wink:

says the rugby player :twisted: come to think of it that doggy picture you posted may be you in your teams scrum :mrgreen:


:lol: now your getting it :lol:

What did you play mate, AussyFAGfootball. :wink:
User avatar
By nikon133
#38356
again monetary gains are different for both drivers, shall we have both drivers on the same salary? thats fair! isnt that what you guys are whinging about? fairness?

so what if one day Lewis asked Ron if he could buy the LM Mac to his reply its not for sale but you can have it if you win the title for us.
You know handshake deal, big deal! and if Heikki said i want that car too if i win the title are you suggesting Ron would say no?
if you are saying Ron would say No to Heikki, youre basing that on a biased view against Ron. which youve shown alot on here.

so who really has the unbiased view here Mike? :wink:


Bud your way off the mark mate, nikon133 explained what the problem here is perfectly so I don’t have to add anything.

But being me I will add that this perfectly explains the Hammy – Ron relationship.


Image

But they take turns,the positions are interchangeable & its plain to see. :wink:


I guess reason for my dissatisfaction about this car deal is actually about Hammy - Ron relationship, which I'm finding was part - or even the core - of Alonso issue McLaren had last season. And while I like Heiki, I'd still prefer if 2007 didn't happen (as it did) and we still have content Alonso in McLaren.

As I see it, Ron has showed very personal and biased affection toward one driver which resulted in disastrous outcome for the whole team. And he's still doing the same.
User avatar
By bud
#38358
Yeah Aussie Football as a kid but played basketball mostly and played div 4 state league basketball as an adult, and now ive quit that and im into Karting 8)
User avatar
By Jensonb
#38359
again monetary gains are different for both drivers, shall we have both drivers on the same salary? thats fair! isnt that what you guys are whinging about? fairness?

so what if one day Lewis asked Ron if he could buy the LM Mac to his reply its not for sale but you can have it if you win the title for us.
You know handshake deal, big deal! and if Heikki said i want that car too if i win the title are you suggesting Ron would say no?
if you are saying Ron would say No to Heikki, youre basing that on a biased view against Ron. which youve shown alot on here.

so who really has the unbiased view here Mike? :wink:


Bud your way off the mark mate, nikon133 explained what the problem here is perfectly so I don’t have to add anything.

But being me I will add that this perfectly explains the Hammy – Ron relationship.


Image

But they take turns,the positions are interchangeable & its plain to see. :wink:


I guess reason for my dissatisfaction about this car deal is actually about Hammy - Ron relationship, which I'm finding was part - or even the core - of Alonso issue McLaren had last season. And while I like Heiki, I'd still prefer if 2007 didn't happen (as it did) and we still have content Alonso in McLaren.

As I see it, Ron has showed very personal and biased affection toward one driver which resulted in disastrous outcome for the whole team. And he's still doing the same.

My thoughts exactly.

Hence my urging for Heikki to kick his a**
  • 1
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10

See our F1 related articles too!