FORUMula1.com

F1 and Motorsport Forums

Formula One related discussion.
#362314
darwin dali wrote:Just because of who won and who lost and the point situation. :cloud9:
And that's how you decide on if its a decent Grand Prix - whether your man won or not?

I expected better of you. :(
#362315
LewEngBridewell wrote:- and the leader just scampered
There was nothing wrong with the leader scampering in this instance. :thumbup:

I hope he does it again in Monza just to really annoy the Tiffosi after pathetic booing. :twisted::hehe:
#362317
LRW wrote:
darwin dali wrote:Just because of who won and who lost and the point situation. :cloud9:
And that's how you decide on if its a decent Grand Prix - whether your man won or not?

I expected better of you. :(
Hey, I can add a point for that if I wish - nothing wrong with that. Objectively, it was probably an 8.
#362318
darwin dali wrote:
LRW wrote:
darwin dali wrote:Just because of who won and who lost and the point situation. :cloud9:
And that's how you decide on if its a decent Grand Prix - whether your man won or not?

I expected better of you. :(
Hey, I can add a point for that if I wish - nothing wrong with that. Objectively, it was probably an 8.
Add a point for sure, that's more than acceptable. But you originally said it was a 9 JUST because he won..... :wink:
#362319
I give it an 8. Mainly because the drivers were actually racing, that was a novelty! Enjoyed the battle for 2 nd, enjoyed the different strategies, enjoyed seeing Massa come thought he field. Enjoyed the little battles throughout the field. A pretty good race.
#362320
LRW wrote:
darwin dali wrote:
LRW wrote:
darwin dali wrote:Just because of who won and who lost and the point situation. :cloud9:
And that's how you decide on if its a decent Grand Prix - whether your man won or not?

I expected better of you. :(
Hey, I can add a point for that if I wish - nothing wrong with that. Objectively, it was probably an 8.
Add a point for sure, that's more than acceptable. But you originally said it was a 9 JUST because he won..... :wink:
That was in response to your criticism - it's a 9 just because ... but it would be an 8 w/o that ...
#362322
darwin dali wrote:That was in response to your criticism - it's a 9 just because ... but it would be an 8 w/o that ...
Oh you've totally misunderstood - I wasn't criticising your score at all - i think I was just shocked anyone could rate that one so high, as I just found it a rather dull race yesterday.
#362323
LRW wrote:
darwin dali wrote:That was in response to your criticism - it's a 9 just because ... but it would be an 8 w/o that ...
Oh you've totally misunderstood - I wasn't criticising your score at all - i think I was just shocked anyone could rate that one so high, as I just found it a rather dull race yesterday.
Well, I think with the full-out racing rather than the tire preserving trundling in previous races, you'd have to classify it higher than 6, especially considering there was no action-infusing rain. There were also some nice battles going on behind SV, but maybe you were already dozing off at that time? :wink:
#362325
darwin dali wrote:
LRW wrote:
darwin dali wrote:That was in response to your criticism - it's a 9 just because ... but it would be an 8 w/o that ...
Oh you've totally misunderstood - I wasn't criticising your score at all - i think I was just shocked anyone could rate that one so high, as I just found it a rather dull race yesterday.
Well, I think with the full-out racing rather than the tire preserving trundling in previous races, you'd have to classify it higher than 6, especially considering there was no action-infusing rain. There were also some nice battles going on behind SV, but maybe you were already dozing off at that time? :wink:
In fairness, I had been watching motor racing all day at Brands Hatch, so I was too knackered to invest too much of myself into it. So I'll add a point on for that. So I'm now at 7.

See we almost agree now.
#362326
LRW wrote:
darwin dali wrote:
LRW wrote:
darwin dali wrote:That was in response to your criticism - it's a 9 just because ... but it would be an 8 w/o that ...
Oh you've totally misunderstood - I wasn't criticising your score at all - i think I was just shocked anyone could rate that one so high, as I just found it a rather dull race yesterday.
Well, I think with the full-out racing rather than the tire preserving trundling in previous races, you'd have to classify it higher than 6, especially considering there was no action-infusing rain. There were also some nice battles going on behind SV, but maybe you were already dozing off at that time? :wink:
In fairness, I had been watching motor racing all day at Brands Hatch, so I was too knackered to invest too much of myself into it. So I'll add a point on for that. So I'm now at 7.

See we almost agree now.
Good boy - next you're going to kiss my stiletto heels and beg for a belly rub :whip:
#362327
darwin dali wrote:
LRW wrote:
darwin dali wrote:
LRW wrote:
darwin dali wrote:That was in response to your criticism - it's a 9 just because ... but it would be an 8 w/o that ...
Oh you've totally misunderstood - I wasn't criticising your score at all - i think I was just shocked anyone could rate that one so high, as I just found it a rather dull race yesterday.
Well, I think with the full-out racing rather than the tire preserving trundling in previous races, you'd have to classify it higher than 6, especially considering there was no action-infusing rain. There were also some nice battles going on behind SV, but maybe you were already dozing off at that time? :wink:
In fairness, I had been watching motor racing all day at Brands Hatch, so I was too knackered to invest too much of myself into it. So I'll add a point on for that. So I'm now at 7.

See we almost agree now.
Good boy - next you're going to kiss my stiletto heels and beg for a belly rub :whip:
Errr... No.
#362328
LRW wrote:
darwin dali wrote:
LRW wrote:
darwin dali wrote:
LRW wrote:
darwin dali wrote:That was in response to your criticism - it's a 9 just because ... but it would be an 8 w/o that ...
Oh you've totally misunderstood - I wasn't criticising your score at all - i think I was just shocked anyone could rate that one so high, as I just found it a rather dull race yesterday.
Well, I think with the full-out racing rather than the tire preserving trundling in previous races, you'd have to classify it higher than 6, especially considering there was no action-infusing rain. There were also some nice battles going on behind SV, but maybe you were already dozing off at that time? :wink:
In fairness, I had been watching motor racing all day at Brands Hatch, so I was too knackered to invest too much of myself into it. So I'll add a point on for that. So I'm now at 7.

See we almost agree now.
Good boy - next you're going to kiss my stiletto heels and beg for a belly rub :whip:
Errr... No.
:(
#362332
LRW wrote:
darwin dali wrote:
LRW wrote:
darwin dali wrote:Good boy - next you're going to kiss my stiletto heels and beg for a belly rub :whip:
Errr... No.
:(
Don't worry, you'll survive.
Barely :cry:
  • 1
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
Williams Support

It has been a really disappointing season for them[…]

Austin's F1 circuit.

COTA is one of the best tracks on the calendar, an[…]

Really happy to see Max Verstappen win his first r[…]

McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]

Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!