This is getting really old and childish. LH, Kov, Kimi, Massa, Kubica, Heidfeld are the top 6 drivers and they are good at what they do, there's no luck. If you have facts then lets see it otherwise don't support your facts with just he is lucky.[/quote]
What I am saying is that if Ferrari drivers didn't run into trouble today they would of both defeated Lewis. In fact all the good potentials that could of won over Lewis Hamilton had a bad day. The Ferrari car is simply better than that of McLaren. Everyone has a bad day. What comes around goes around so it will eventually happen to McLaren and things will even out and the guy with the best car will win like last season. Don't worry this insignficant first race of the season means nothing.[/quote]
You cannot say that with any level of certainty. It is merely a prediction that could go either way. Even without the problems, Massa wasn't quite on the same pace as Hamilton. Raikkonen had his chance and made a mistake, followed by another one. It happens. You also cannot say that the Ferrari car is better than the McLaren because, this weekend, that has not been proven so. The McLaren has been faster in almost all sessions and has shown great reliability, whereas both Ferraris have suffered numerous problems. The Ferrari car is good, but it's too late to be saying who has the best car and who doesn't. The best indications will probably come when we reach the European races...[/quote]
Well I still disagree. Ferrari was quickest in pre-season testing and the mistakes that Kimi made were his mistakes not Ferrari's. Clearly McLaren had a better day not a better car. Lewis better party hard and take this opportunity to celebrate because he will be getting used to coming second more often after Ferrari wins most races after this. Unless of course Ferrari has a bad race everyrace which is unlikely.
