FORUMula1.com

[CookinFlat6]

I'm glad there was no looking up Cookie is that the order you'd place the top 10.

Ah, I didn't realise we had to rank them according to number of laps led, my list was just intuition with some reasoning to eliminate drivers. That's a very hard proposition but I'd have to then put vettel MS then Prost, not sure about the rest and I wouldn't be surprised if Fangio hadn't led every race he was in at some point

[racechick]

I'm glad there was no looking up Cookie is that the order you'd place the top 10.

Ah, I didn't realise we had to rank them according to number of laps led, my list was just intuition with some reasoning to eliminate drivers. That's a very hard proposition but I'd have to then put vettel MS then Prost, not sure about the rest and I wouldn't be surprised if Fangio hadn't led every race he was in at some point

Yep. Rank them from driver having led most down to driver having led least. Edit your post when you've decided on the order.

[andrew]

Is it 50 and over races or just 50 races?

[CookinFlat6]

So the top guy led the most races, and 50 is how many the tenth guy led?

Or

The top guy led the most laps in the 50 races with the 10th guy leading the fewest (at least one tho) laps in the 50?

[LRW]

I believe RC is after the top ten drivers who have led in 50 or more F1 races....

[CookinFlat6]

The ten drivers who led the most races then?

[LRW]

The ten drivers who led the most races then?

Yes.

Well that's what I thought she meant. I could be wrong.

[CookinFlat6]

Ok it must be Seb first because we now have the longest season and he has had the best car for 4 years
Then MS
Reubens
Alonso
Lewis
Prost
Senna
Picquet
Stuck here so guess time
Kimi
Lauda

[LRW]

Bites tounge.....

[Denthúl]

I'm glad there was no looking up Cookie is that the order you'd place the top 10.

Ah, I didn't realise we had to rank them according to number of laps led, my list was just intuition with some reasoning to eliminate drivers. That's a very hard proposition but I'd have to then put vettel MS then Prost, not sure about the rest and I wouldn't be surprised if Fangio hadn't led every race he was in at some point

Yep. Rank them from driver having led most down to driver having led least. Edit your post when you've decided on the order.

Oh. I am way too lazy for that.

You owe me a cake anyways, though.

[racechick]

Sorry. Yes. Only ten drivers have led in 50 or more GP,s . Who Ar these drivers and rank them from the one who's led in the most GPs Down to the tenth driver.
Sorry I wasn't very clear with that was I
Keep biting LRW

[CookinFlat6]

Well sounds like I am really off the pace

I am itching to find out now, great thread Rc, thanks

[Coronis]

Ok lets see

Schumacher
Senna
Prost
Alonso
Coulthard
Raikkonen
Piquet
Mansell
Barrichello
Vettel

Hmm, people seem to underestimate a few people here.... Senna ahead of Prost because I read somewhere in one season he won more races but still lost the championship? Alonso, years with Renault, McLaren and Ferrari. Coulthard wasn't mentioned but I reckon he'd have a few. Was with McLaren from 96-04. Read so much about him during my Hakkinen phase lol. Raikkonen same as Alonso but in a different order.. Barrichello was with Ferrari all that time, be very surprised if he wasn't there.

[mnmracer]

Ok it must be Seb first because we now have the longest season and he has had the best car for 4 years
Then MS

Vettel only has driven 12 more races than Schumi has wins. So... no.

Yep. Rank them from driver having led most down to driver having led least. Edit your post when you've decided on the order.

Editted.

[Jabberwocky]

Rubens must be in there... maybe even someone like DC as drivers who where second best in the best car