- 16 Dec 12, 18:23#339662
Maybe he's off to help Porsche win Le Mans? 

"I don't want to be part of a forum where everyone has differing opinions." Boom...
Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
The amount of speculation that goes on without anyone here knowing what really took place is remarkable.
Well, i know i have based my opinion (that he has been scapegoated) on what Haug has said himself, which is surely not that leftfield.
And I don't doubt there was some of that as well but the guy wasn't simply running F1 for Mercedes, he was VP of motorsports... all motorsports and they did have a pretty damned banner year in DTM so I think there's a lot of factors that all weighed in on the decision. So I do tend to believe that it was mutual. Obviously if he goes off to work with BMW or Audi next year it would imply a lot but as of now it's mostly conjecture.
So if Haug was the scapegoat; who are they going to blame next season for their poo performance; they'll probably start off well and fade as the season goes on. I just don't think that Mercedes has the hunger, in my view firing Haug is a great indication of that; Haug had the passion for motorsport; like all manufacturers with the exception of Ferrari solely use F1 as a marketing exercise for their brand. I just have no faith that Mercedes can pull it out of the bag like their predecessors, BMW, Honda, Toyota and Renault!
Sounds more like you want Merc to fail and its obvious to see why.
If you want to believe that I want Merc to fail for whatever obvious reason you see... so be it! But the reality is that I don't want any team to fail, I'd like to see Merc to do well and challenge the frontrunners. I am just expressing an opinion; given Merc's performance in the last few years; and getting rid of a key man in Mercedes just before preparations are just about to start; it doesn't bode well for the future. It's like all those football teams that sack managers, only to be as crap as they were before the managerial change!
Well if you chose to respond to that one line instead of my entire post, forget it.
All I can say is this is no regular sacking. Mercedes had plenty of opportunities to sack Haug during those stale years McLaren have had with Mercedes being an engine supplier but they didn't. This could be a part of further restructuring which is mutually agreed by all parties in order to make immediate improvements for the future. None of us know the full story, but in the end the cars will be doing the 'talking' on track and we shall see what Merc's response is staring March 2013.
The amount of speculation that goes on without anyone here knowing what really took place is remarkable.
Well, i know i have based my opinion (that he has been scapegoated) on what Haug has said himself, which is surely not that leftfield.
And I don't doubt there was some of that as well but the guy wasn't simply running F1 for Mercedes, he was VP of motorsports... all motorsports and they did have a pretty damned banner year in DTM so I think there's a lot of factors that all weighed in on the decision. So I do tend to believe that it was mutual. Obviously if he goes off to work with BMW or Audi next year it would imply a lot but as of now it's mostly conjecture.
But Haug's own wording (see the article posted further up by Andrew) suggests that this is more to do with him assuming responsibility for the lack of results in F1 rather than DTM (which is completely unmentioned), that's what my point is. I believe it was indeed a mutual split, in the idea that Haug accepted responsibility - even where it wasn't his fault.
See our F1 related articles too!