FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#334096
Formula 1 is to ban, on safety grounds, the free use of the DRS overtaking aid in practice and qualifying from 2013.

Drivers have complained there have been incidents when some have lost control because they are testing the limits of when they can use the DRS.

The device reduces rear downforce to boost straight-line speed.

The sport's governing body, the FIA, will also introduce more stringent tests to stop front wings moving for aerodynamic benefit.

This practice has been under the spotlight in recent years as teams seek to design front wings that change their characteristics in certain parts of the tracks to either improve cornering or straight-line performance.

New tests for this year have stopped wings flexing down at either end to aid cornering performance.

But a new practice has emerged whereby wings rotate on their horizontal axis - reducing their effectiveness on the straights and therefore increasing top speed.

Currently, flexible wings are policed by a single load applied downwards in one place on each side of the wing. From next year, the load will be applied in two places - one further back from the current test point and one further forwards.

As far as the DRS is concerned, next year its use will be restricted to the specific zones on the track aimed at increasing overtaking.

The DRS - or drag-reduction system - operates by lifting the upper part of the rear wing, reducing drag and boosting straight-line speed.

In the race it is only allowed in specified zones on either one or two straights.

But use has been free during practice and qualifying since its introduction in 2011, the reasoning being that if teams could gain a lap-time benefit for qualifying they would make the device as effective as possible which would have the benefit of making overtaking easier.

But Charlie Whiting, the race director of governing body the FIA, said he was now confident this would still be the case and that the safety aspects were too important to ignore.

"We are going to prohibit the use of DRS in practice and qualifying except in the areas where it's going to be used in the race," Whiting said.

"We're doing that for safety reasons. We believe there have been a number of incidents and drivers have told me it is becoming increasingly prevalent.

"We didn't want to have it in practice and qualifying before but we were worried we would not have effective DRS systems. Now all the information we have is that we will not see any reduction in the power of the DRS."


This is a sudden change in the rules! I expect we shall therefore see the rear wing design philosophy change - perhaps to something a bit closer to what McLaren ran early last season.
#334097
Interesting. It also makes the passive DRS development some teams dove into this year a lot less meaningful since its such a drastic reduction in effectiveness during qualifying.
#334098
Yep. So a massive waste of resources for Lotus there, sadly. It will also make the DRS far less effective period, as teams will run wings designed for downforce (ie, net lap time) over a lower drag potential.
#334107
Interesting. It also makes the passive DRS development some teams dove into this year a lot less meaningful since its such a drastic reduction in effectiveness during qualifying.


Not sure I follow, it would be more benificial imo, unless you're meaning the systems like the current merc that operates when the drs is used.
#334108
Well I'm glad to see this. I've been wondering from the start why they allowed unlimited DRS in practice and qualifying. If DRS was meant as an overtaking tool in restricted areas during the race, why bother?
#334109
Slightly off-topic but related; instead of banning the device on safety grounds, simply add gravel traps and grass to the edge of the track; then the drivers won't risk it for fear of getting beached and out of the session. Having these massive run off area just make it possible for drivers to push beyond the limits without fear of ending their session!
#334124
Interesting. It also makes the passive DRS development some teams dove into this year a lot less meaningful since its such a drastic reduction in effectiveness during qualifying.


Not sure I follow, it would be more benificial imo, unless you're meaning the systems like the current merc that operates when the drs is used.

It's return on investment. If you have a markedly better DRS system. It's a greater advantage over other teams if you can deploy it longer. So 35 seconds a lap would be more time spent leveraging that advantage than if you're only allowed to use it for 15 seconds a lap.
#334138
Interesting. It also makes the passive DRS development some teams dove into this year a lot less meaningful since its such a drastic reduction in effectiveness during qualifying.


Not sure I follow, it would be more benificial imo, unless you're meaning the systems like the current merc that operates when the drs is used.

It's return on investment. If you have a markedly better DRS system. It's a greater advantage over other teams if you can deploy it longer. So 35 seconds a lap would be more time spent leveraging that advantage than if you're only allowed to use it for 15 seconds a lap.

Now I'm getting confused, how do you enable/disable a passive DRS?
#334139
Interesting. It also makes the passive DRS development some teams dove into this year a lot less meaningful since its such a drastic reduction in effectiveness during qualifying.


Not sure I follow, it would be more benificial imo, unless you're meaning the systems like the current merc that operates when the drs is used.

It's return on investment. If you have a markedly better DRS system. It's a greater advantage over other teams if you can deploy it longer. So 35 seconds a lap would be more time spent leveraging that advantage than if you're only allowed to use it for 15 seconds a lap.

Now I'm getting confused, how do you enable/disable a passive DRS?

Not passive DRS but secondary effect DRS. Passive DRS is very difficult to implement right as Lotus has proven and it works only to supplement your primary DRS which now you're not able to use as much during qualifying.
#334140
Interesting. It also makes the passive DRS development some teams dove into this year a lot less meaningful since its such a drastic reduction in effectiveness during qualifying.


Not sure I follow, it would be more benificial imo, unless you're meaning the systems like the current merc that operates when the drs is used.

It's return on investment. If you have a markedly better DRS system. It's a greater advantage over other teams if you can deploy it longer. So 35 seconds a lap would be more time spent leveraging that advantage than if you're only allowed to use it for 15 seconds a lap.

Now I'm getting confused, how do you enable/disable a passive DRS?

Not passive DRS but secondary effect DRS. Passive DRS is very difficult to implement right as Lotus has proven and it works only to supplement your primary DRS which now you're not able to use as much during qualifying.

So the passive DRS that doesn't rely on the driver controlled DRS could be more benificial and worth looking into more than before, unless there's any plans on the way to ban that too.
#334141
It wasn't deemed illegal, but it's very difficult to get working and it is very intertwined with the primary DRS, which you'll be using a lot less during Q.

    See our F1 related articles too!