- 16 Oct 12, 11:17#327576
A racing car that does not win, is just art
I suppose they paid 100 Million on photocopying a few years ago

A racing car that does not win, is just art
F1 and Motorsport Forums

LewEngBridewell wrote:Very true indeed.bud wrote:more like what new far fetched excuse will Lewis fans make in India. I mean ffs fans of motorsport should be above this, claiming reliability issues as a deliberate act by a team to hinder one of their own is just utter nonsense. Fans know this about motorsport, fanboys don't seem to.Very true.
racechick wrote:oh Andrew!!! you didn't even voteI'm sure he did vote. Just in his head.. You disappoint me.

racechick wrote:oh Andrew!!! you didn't even voteThere wasn't an option that appealed to me like "nothing".. You disappoint me.


Jabberwocky wrote:I have been thinking about that and maybe (pulling on flame suit) Lewis has been pushing the car more because he wants that championship and has not been as caring with it as he would normally be and this is causing the failures. I believe it is something that Sir Moss did as well.This reminds me of the 2005 "Kimi is blowing his engines", 1998/1999 "Mika is blowing his engines", our latest edition is "Hamilton is breaking his suspensions".
Win or blow the car up trying.

Jabberwocky wrote:well if yo usaid you had voted and the number of votes has not changed then you have not voted.I said I hadn't voted after it was assumed that I hadn't, not before.
andrew wrote:No conspiracy Andrew, like Jab says, if votes stay the same, you've not votedracechick wrote:oh Andrew!!! you didn't even voteThere wasn't an option that appealed to me like "nothing".. You disappoint me.
How do you know who votes? Kind of defeats the reason of an anonymous poll.
racechick wrote:There you go on about conspiracies again!andrew wrote:No conspiracy Andrew, like Jab says, if votes stay the same, you've not votedracechick wrote:oh Andrew!!! you didn't even voteThere wasn't an option that appealed to me like "nothing".. You disappoint me.
How do you know who votes? Kind of defeats the reason of an anonymous poll.
Jabberwocky wrote:I mean things like taking a bit more kerb, putting a bit more load on the tires etc etc...These cars are designed to absorb those impacts. If they get damaged in the process of using the full extent of the race track, the car is simply not good enough.
the 1998 McLaren was the 1st Newey car, and they are always fragile until the team catches up with his needs. Think how unreliable the 2007 Red Bull was.
andrew wrote:no, I was discounting them before you started. conspiracies are your department.racechick wrote:There you go on about conspiracies again!andrew wrote:No conspiracy Andrew, like Jab says, if votes stay the same, you've not votedracechick wrote:oh Andrew!!! you didn't even voteThere wasn't an option that appealed to me like "nothing".. You disappoint me.
How do you know who votes? Kind of defeats the reason of an anonymous poll.
McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]
Madring was a pretty dull race. I wouldn't mi[…]
Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!