Come on, he's not bad, as far as team mates go, he's performing better than Massa, Grossjean and that's it at least as far as the leading teams.
Considering he's won a wdc, beaten his teammate at least once, won two races this season ...and crashed many times fewer than his teammate.. I'd say he's performed better than at least a couple more drivers.
But yea...
You're going to get into big trouble mister saying that Jenson is considerably better than Vettel, this year at least. 
I'm glad that you bring up the beating Hamilton fair and square last year, yes in deed he did. Maybe now you'll admit that Lewis Hamilton, also beat Fernando Alonso (a two time world champion!) in his rookie year.
I like that we're in a better understanding place f1ea, it's been nice. 
Considerably better than who?
First of all i never say anyone IS better, lest IS CONSIDERABLY BETTER.
About Alonso... i didnt bring that up, but that can be discussed separtely in the Thats Lewis thread if you want.
So yeah... if you're gonna try and discuss my posts, at least learn how to read.
Testy when you don't get things your way? I was trying to apply logic, given your argument, ergo, Vettel 1 win, Jenson, 2 wins... you know it does make sense given the logic to your statement but you seem to disregard logic whenever it's convenient . Sometimes my jokes don't come across when I phrase them, you know what that's like. No need to rehash the other issue, the facts on that lead you to only one conclusion, but again those pesky facts. 
I do know how to read, apparently what YOU should learn to do is say what you mean instead of trying to be cute in stirring the pot. That would be okay if not for the fact that you obviously don't like it when it goes the other way around, but that's just your style, don't take it as a personal affront. It would probably help you to just keep in mind the definition to the word I found in the Merriam-Webster's book the other day.
Have your opinion all you want dude, just phrase it like that, and when presented with an opposing opinion that also happens to bear facts, then you're still allowed to keep your opinion but you can't say the other guy is wrong unless you present better and more convincing facts of your own.
That's it, I won't pay such close attention to your posts, since you'd rather not have them scrutinized for accuracy. Enjoy, peace in the middle east.
So you apply YOUR logic to my statement, and say that I said Jenson is considerably better than Vettel. Then you say it is MY LOGIC. Really, WTF?!
Actually, it goes very closely related to how you interpreted the Jenson quotes above. You make your own assumptions based on YOUR logic, and pin it to what the other said to start a discussion (and stir the pot?).
Luckily i didn't fall for your trap and started some meaningless discussion about who is considerably better between Jenson or Vettel. Nor started a discussion about how Jenson is playing mindgames or not, based on your lead.
Sorry to disappoint you; but i already went through kindergarten, i know how it works.
:p
Came out fighting indeed.
