- 11 Sep 12, 15:30#319952
That's why Williams/Porsche is exploring the flywheel. There are a lot of benefits to it.
"I don't want to be part of a forum where everyone has differing opinions." Boom...
F1 and Motorsport Forums
What's Burning? wrote:That's why Williams/Porsche is exploring the flywheel. There are a lot of benefits to it.As proven in the utterly brilliant Audi R18 E-Tron's, they run a Williams flywheel system.
stonemonkey wrote:When I first read about the flywheel system proposed when KERS was being considered the description of it involved a mechanical link to the drive through a CVT but that's not what the williams system is, is it? The energy is put into and taken out as electrical energy with the flywheel basically replacing the battery part of the system?Yes. Benefits incluse MUCH greater capacity given that the faster it spins the more energy it holds. I can be placed very low for a reduced COG. Tremendously cheaper as there is no battery replacement or wear.
What's Burning? wrote:I can only think it might have to be mounted vertically.stonemonkey wrote:When I first read about the flywheel system proposed when KERS was being considered the description of it involved a mechanical link to the drive through a CVT but that's not what the williams system is, is it? The energy is put into and taken out as electrical energy with the flywheel basically replacing the battery part of the system?Yes. Benefits incluse MUCH greater capacity given that the faster it spins the more energy it holds. I can be placed very low for a reduced COG. Tremendously cheaper as there is no battery replacement or wear.
...one thing I've wondered about it is if there are any gyroscopic advantages or disadvantages that have to be compensated for.
What's Burning? wrote:See I was thinking horizontally as that would affect up and down movement which may be beneficial as opposed to vertically that would affect left and right movement.A giro (actually the housing) can rotate around it's own axis without any problems so if vertical then the giro won't exert any unwanted forces on the car when turning left/right. If mounted horizontally, either front-back or left-right then it would exert forces wanting to tip the car over and altering how the weight is distributed between the wheels as it turns and in the case of front to back mounting the forces would act differently depending on if the car is turning left or right. I think.

stonemonkey wrote:I'm not sure about your calculations, also you wouldn't want to be discharging to 0good point

stonemonkey wrote:That's an interesting point if the gyro is free floating in the housing, I think guidance gyroscopes work that way to allow for mobility. But this isn't a gyroscope it's a flywheel so the mounting mechanism wouldn't need to float at all and in a race car more than likely anything that can be fixed, is. That doesn't negate the potential gyroscopic effect of it though, and it's why I asked because I'm at the edge of my knowledge here.What's Burning? wrote:See I was thinking horizontally as that would affect up and down movement which may be beneficial as opposed to vertically that would affect left and right movement.A giro (actually the housing) can rotate around it's own axis without any problems so if vertical then the giro won't exert any unwanted forces on the car when turning left/right. If mounted horizontally, either front-back or left-right then it would exert forces wanting to tip the car over and altering how the weight is distributed between the wheels as it turns and in the case of front to back mounting the forces would act differently depending on if the car is turning left or right. I think.
stonemonkey wrote:Ah no, i dont mean its free floating but the housing rotates with the car.I think it's called a gimbal or something like that or maybe that's just the term for the aircraft dial that measures rotation and pitch.
Military aircraft gyros, at least the ones i worked on, were fixed with the aircraft.
What's Burning? wrote:A gimbal allows rotation about an axis.stonemonkey wrote:Ah no, i dont mean its free floating but the housing rotates with the car.I think it's called a gimbal or something like that or maybe that's just the term for the aircraft dial that measures rotation and pitch.
Military aircraft gyros, at least the ones i worked on, were fixed with the aircraft.
Anyway, we're on the same page. A gyroscope doesn't need to be very large, where this flywheel is something that I'm thinking would have 30 or 40 lbs or heft to it, who knows.
Maybe our resident green jacket engineer will chime in! I could just go try and google it but it's so much more fun to try and figure things out here with our little bits and pieces of information.
What kind of military aircraft did you work on?
Jabberwocky wrote:if it was mounted like a spinning top it would try to keep the car flat, however would you not have issues when the mass accelerates and decelerates when it is charged/discharged.Yep, it would apply torque to the chassis, I don't know which would cause more of a problem, that or the precession of a horizontal flywheel when the car is turning. Some of the problems could be sorted by having pairs of smaller flywheels turning on opposing directions.

Madring was a pretty dull race. I wouldn't mi[…]
Not sure yet, but it looks that way - Kimi is on[…]
Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!