FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
By Hammer278
#303214
That's a solution, but I find it a bit of a waste...tyres used for on short session and then no more, even with plenty of life left.

Why not just make it mandatory for ALL cars in Q3 to at least do 3 laps in the session (or else you'll be moved to the back of the grid). They can just roll out and cruise around if they wish. :hehe:
By vaptin
#303216
What makes rapidly degrading tyres fake, but long lasting ones natural? It's just a matter of perspective.


Reality... Michelin is pushing all season tires rated for 90k miles... Up and down the pits in Grand Am and LMS you can find cars doing triple stints the lenght of two entire F1 races with regularity in 12 and 24 hour events. Yes, it's not natural to have tires that completely fall off a cliff in 10~12 laps.

Part of the sport and it's the same for everyone but yeah it's not reality.


I wasn't using the word natural as a marker for "standard, or generally accepted", I meant I know the tyres have been contrived intentionally, but so have long lasting tyres. I disagree with the idea that one is "natural or real", but the other is fake.

There where complaints that long lasting tyres were making the racing boring, a new supplier came in with the promise of degrading ones, with a high variation between new and used, they delivered and produced exciting races, I can't really understand the reasoning that just because it was designed to be that way it is wrong and "unnatural" whereas Bridgestone tyres designed to be durable to provide good branding and marketing is" natural". The only problem I have, is that the FIA failed to update the tyre restriction rules to take into account faster degrading tyres.
#303217
My problem isn't with the racing it's with the qualifying which is the way it is because an extra set of options come race day is the clearest path to a win more so than having the fastest car on Saturday.

What if brakes were purposely designed to lose their effectiveness 3/4 into the race? Same principal, and just as pointless but boy would it spicy up the racing.
By andrew
#303246
Who's birthday is it for the next race?


Ron Dennis a couple of days after.


What better way to celebrate than getting that elusive 150th pole position! :P


Thus proving that F1 is fake as it is clearly engineered towards Ron Dennis. :yikes:
User avatar
By killem2
#303251
And bernie also came in, and had the williams car explode and put REAL people in the hospital.

F1 fake. :rolleyes:

Die of cancer.

Not directed at anyone in particular, though, that's how I feel.
User avatar
By Jabberwocky
#303264
For all the people who like movies, could it be like Final Destination! Senna has just completed his 5th Williams race.....
User avatar
By racechick
#303286
What makes rapidly degrading tyres fake, but long lasting ones natural? It's just a matter of perspective.


Reality... Michelin is pushing all season tires rated for 90k miles... Up and down the pits in Grand Am and LMS you can find cars doing triple stints the lenght of two entire F1 races with regularity in 12 and 24 hour events. Yes, it's not natural to have tires that completely fall off a cliff in 10~12 laps.

Part of the sport and it's the same for everyone but yeah it's not reality.

The cliff is another problem, but they don't drop of immediately, there is a fair bit of degradation before they loose grip massively.


That's not true, missing the window by one lap we've seen drivers lose 7 positions in two laps.

The best solution I've heard so far is to simply give everyone that makes it to Q3 a set of options to use only there and give back after the session. Would solve a lot of the qualifying fiasco of not even making an attempt. Anyone that spends $500 dollars for a weekend ticket deserves to see all ten cars running on track on Q3.


:yes: Agree with all that WB. And why on earth dont they do that in quali? :banghead:
User avatar
By cheekybru
#303432
Yup, all drivers in Q3 should get a one off set of tires for that session alone.

And they should scrap DRS, in quali even if they havnt got the balls to scrap it from the race, its s***, few years ago we couldve had 4 laps of lewis trying to fend off seb on dying tires, if he had suceeded it would have been described as a masterfull defenceive drive to conserve the points he had achiced with his earlier brilliance, ,
instead we have Seb breeze past without having to do anything, ITS RUBBISH! :thumbdown:
By Hammer278
#303436
Yup, all drivers in Q3 should get a one off set of tires for that session alone.

And they should scrap DRS, in quali even if they havnt got the balls to scrap it from the race, its s***, few years ago we couldve had 4 laps of lewis trying to fend off seb on dying tires, if he had suceeded it would have been described as a masterfull defenceive drive to conserve the points he had achiced with his earlier brilliance, ,
instead we have Seb breeze past without having to do anything, ITS RUBBISH! :thumbdown:


Agreed. Overtaking/Defensive driving is a massive skill set in the sport called "racing" and DRS has pretty much negated it. Drives like Alonso's at Imola against Schumacher (held him up practically half the race) is never to be seen again.
By mnmracer
#303438
Yup, all drivers in Q3 should get a one off set of tires for that session alone.

And they should scrap DRS, in quali even if they havnt got the balls to scrap it from the race, its s***, few years ago we couldve had 4 laps of lewis trying to fend off seb on dying tires, if he had suceeded it would have been described as a masterfull defenceive drive to conserve the points he had achiced with his earlier brilliance, ,
instead we have Seb breeze past without having to do anything, ITS RUBBISH! :thumbdown:


Agreed. Overtaking/Defensive driving is a massive skill set in the sport called "racing" and DRS has pretty much negated it. Drives like Alonso's at Imola against Schumacher (held him up practically half the race) is never to be seen again.

I think you've missed some defensive races from Vettel and Schumacher last two years.
By mnmracer
#303442
True, Schumacher didn't perse have very defensive whole-races, but he's definitely had his moments of being incrediby hard to overtake.
#303444
True, Schumacher didn't perse have very defensive whole-races, but he's definitely had his moments of being incrediby hard to overtake.


So is Massa, look where it's gotten him. :hehe:

See our F1 related articles too!