Does make me laugh when man u fans go on about city winning the title due to buying it.It's just a case of now someone is spending more than united they don't like it.Yet before they did just the same..Here is a possible starting 11 for man utd.With a total cost of over 200 million
De Gea 19m
Smalling 10m
Ferdinand 27m
Vidic 7m
Jones 17m
Young 17m
Anderson 15m
Carrick 18m
Valencia 16m
Rooney 27m
Berbatov 30m
What is that if it isn't buying the title ??.
Spending on transfers:
Man United: (pounds sterling)
2012: 53M
2011: 27M
2010: 21M
2009: 36M
Man City: (pounds sterling)
2012: 76M
2011: 126M
2010: 125M
2009: 128M
The fact still remains that Man Utd have bought their titles just the same as Man City have.Man Utd have been one of the biggest spenders in english football for as long as i can remember.
The point I was trying to make was that its their fans that don't like it now after all these years other teams have more of a say in the transfer market than what they do.
Its just a shame football is being spoilt by money,too many rich people buying clubs who they don't support and spending fortunes on them.Take Abramovich for example,before he bought Chelsea he was actually on his way to buy Tottenham.
Also the farce of the Man Utd takeover.No wonder banks are in trouble,who in their right mind would let someone buy a football club, with a great structure making millions of pounds a year,then let someone with no interest in football plunge it millions of pounds in debt.Losing something along the lines of £200 million a year ( I heard quoted),Its around 500 million in debt now ? crazy..
No wonder the fans were up in arms about the takeover