Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
How is it irrelevant to bring up an example to counter a claim you made about Management trying to cover up/lie to stewards over an incident?
"This is his brother, he's just had a mental breakdown so he won't be talking about it for a while. Sorry."
http://twitter.com/#!/CraigLongdon_F1
If this is indeed his true state of mind, that's very sad.
How is it irrelevant to bring up an example to counter a claim you made about Management trying to cover up/lie to stewards over an incident?
Because we're discussing whether or not McLaren deliberately and (group-wise) consciously made decisions that led to the rule infraction and the penalty. What other people have or have not done at various times in the past does not tell us anything about what McLaren did or did not do this weekend.
How is it irrelevant to bring up an example to counter a claim you made about Management trying to cover up/lie to stewards over an incident?
Because we're discussing whether or not McLaren deliberately and (group-wise) consciously made decisions that led to the rule infraction and the penalty. What other people have or have not done at various times in the past does not tell us anything about what McLaren did or did not do this weekend.
Sorry but that is bull. It is absolutely relevant that consistency is maintained in applying the rules. Whether or not the perceived over punishing of LH is a fact, he is the highest penalised driver by the FIA (probably ever) and greater offences that we all can remember have gone unpunished.
How is it irrelevant to bring up an example to counter a claim you made about Management trying to cover up/lie to stewards over an incident?
Because we're discussing whether or not McLaren deliberately and (group-wise) consciously made decisions that led to the rule infraction and the penalty. What other people have or have not done at various times in the past does not tell us anything about what McLaren did or did not do this weekend.
Sorry but that is bull. It is absolutely relevant that consistency is maintained in applying the rules. Whether or not the perceived over punishing of LH is a fact, he is the highest penalised driver by the FIA (probably ever) and greater offences that we all can remember have gone unpunished.
Precisely. It was McLarens cockup, but the penalty is insane. What about McLaren + Hamilton's Q1 and Q2 efforts? All those times are erased? The damn car was LEGAL in both those sessions and made it back to the pits. But he's pushed back behind a driver who didn't even make f*cking 107% and given the green to race. F1 is a joke...but "maybe because I'm black". Sorry, had to say it.
The bold, italicized, underlined part is what makes the ruling completely 
ridiculous. His car was legal during those times, so like I mentioned before he should at least have gotten to be P10.I hear Mclaren only have one spare nose this weekend. Why would they only bring one nose? What happens if they both have a first lap incident?
If Hamilton lasts 30 laps on those tyres I will actually strip naked and run down the street.
Would be so funny if they did last and he won the race See our F1 related articles too!
