FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
User avatar
By scotty
#301517
Formula 1 cars could be fitted with forward roll hoops in the future, if ongoing tests by the FIA Institute into increased driver protection continue to deliver good results.

As part of an extensive research programme conducted in the wake of the crashes suffered by Felipe Massa and Henry Surtees in 2009, the FIA Institute has already evaluated polycarbonate windshields and jet fighter canopies to see if they can offer better driver protection.

The latest tests have involved using a titanium roll hoop structure, built by the Lotus team, into which a 20kg F1 wheel is fired at 225 km/h.

On the back of mixed results for the shields - with the polycarbonate one shattering and the aerospace canopy flexing - the roll hoop tests have been more encouraging.

Andy Mellor, the FIA Institute's technical advisor, told the latest issue of IQ magazine: "The roll hoop basically did a very good job. It was able to keep a wheel away from a driver's head. We tested it both by firing the wheel down the centre of the car, and also coming at it from an angle."

The other benefit of the roll hoop design was that the impact deflated the tyre – which meant that it had less chance of being deflected further in subsequent impacts.

"The impact deflated the tyre during both tests," said Mellor. "We tend to think that's a good thing – it means that the wheel doesn't bounce as much. It stops much more quickly if you can deflate the tyre."

Although the first tests have been encouraging, Mellor insists that much more research is needed before the plans can be seriously proposed to Formula 1's decision makers

"At this stage it's almost pure research, which we need if we're to understand what the loads are in such impacts," he said. "We're not at all looking at final solutions as such.

"The work is absolutely exploratory and we are beginning to understand the mechanisms in order to protect a driver's head in this kind of impact. This is the next step in a very detailed process."

When the FIA Institute is satisfied with the results of its tests, and feels that one of the solutions will improve driver safety, then it will put forward its finding to F1's Technical Working Group.


The results are impressive! (edit - see the video on the link for the practical test result). But a smaller projectile such as a spring (which hit Massa) could still get through imo. But i expect some quarters will slate the potential aesthetics of it, like people did with the new noses.
#301518
I say it - it looks daft. However if it going to potentially save a driver from injury or worse then the visual impact is irrelevant. The thinking behind this seems to be for protecting against wayward wheels and tryes howver (as Scotty points out) what about a smaller projectile? There is also the impact on the drivers field of vision (which is already quite limited) to think about.
#301519
And then, drivers will be having accidents at 250 kph because they can't SEE WHAT'S IN FRONT OF THEM because someone put a solid metal roll bar directly in the line of view. :hehe:
#301526
My first thought would be visibility. So, if they can manufacture them roll hoops out of gorilla glass or somtin'...


We wouldn't want it getting scratched now! :hehe:
#301552
Yep, look at the problem... The driver can't!

The only way is a fighter jet style bubble canopy or nothing.


Would they still be considered "open wheel" with one of those though?
#301553
Yep, look at the problem... The driver can't!

The only way is a fighter jet style bubble canopy or nothing.


Would they still be considered "open wheel" with one of those though?


Open wheel but closed cockpit. Nascars whelen modifides are open wheel despite the driver being enclosed like a stock car.

I agree the fighter jet style canopy is the only way to protect the driver fully from debris. Then you get the issue of emergency evac from the car and visibility in the rain.
#301566
don't aircraft canopies have explosives in them to shatter them when the pilot ejects

Yeah, but F1 will probably have to use KERS for that purpose - what if your KERS is depleted at the moment you need that canopy ejected? :P
#301568
All this for an oncoming projectile...? What about a sidewards projectile...?

I know its more likely to come from the front but we need to draw the line somewhere.....!

Surely part of the attraction of the sport, (for both audience and driver) is the danger....?
#301570
This is not a bad idea but I think they are unnecessary. I could go on and on but my fingers are getting tired. :D
#301647
What they could do is an open canopy that starts at the front tires and ends where the cockpit is so drivers can get in and out. This would solve visibility issues and escape/exit issues. No ejections needed!!

See our F1 related articles too!