FORUMula1.com

[Hammer278]

We should add this one too

http://twitpic.com/1ou7qw" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Holy crap he was freakin unfit for a 27 year old.

[bud]

I have some FAR better bullet points than yours

I bet they are snippets from chapters in the book I posted

No conspiracy theories in my bullets. Whitmarsh has them all to himself. In fact the problem is wittling it down to just three


edit: Loved your bullets Scotty

You just admitted it thanks

[racechick]

I said Whitmarsh would have the bullet points all to himself. What am I supposed to be admitting to now? If you dont like my views on Whitmarsh why do you keep bringing the subject up? Im not going to do a book title on Whitmarsh. If I do post my views it will be in a reasoned arguement saying why Iv'e arrived at the views I have. You may then reply with silly books ,Cospiracy ridicule, call me a loony or anything else along those lines if it makes you feel better.

[bud]

Let's see your views on Whitmarsh, I'd like to see how you can have them but then say you do not believe in the conspiracies that are brought up. They are the same thing!

[racechick]

Its not the same thing. A conspiracy means people are planning together for a particular outcome. I'll post my thoughts but it will take me a while to write them all down. I hope if I do that you'll keep an open mind when reading them.

[bud]

Its not the same thing. A conspiracy means people are planning together for a particular outcome. I'll post my thoughts but it will take me a while to write them all down. I hope if I do that you'll keep an open mind when reading them.

You don't know what conspiracy means then if you think your views on Whitmarsh aren't exactly that!

[racechick]

What so you dont think I understand the meaning of the word conspiracy? You dispute the definition Iv just given? Or are you saying my definition is correct and Whitmarsh does do that? I was a little confused with your statement because you seemed to contradict yourself.

[bud]

For your theories on Whitmarsh, which are just that "Theories" (I'm sure you know that words meaning) the best word and most commonly used in naming such theories is conspiracy theory. To suggest Whitmarsh favours Jenson at the detriment of Lewis is a conspiracy theory!

[racechick]

I dont think it is. He would have to conspire with someone else for it to be a conspiracy, I dont think he does that. Yes I also know what 'theory' means and have only ever said my thoughts are that. Why dont we stop cluttering up the F1 book thread and you wait till I actually post my thoughts before jumping to conclusions?

[bud]

Sorry it is a conspiracy theory!

[racechick]

Then you clearly dont understand what conspiracy means.

[bud]

Then you clearly dont understand what conspiracy means.

Seriously you think English words are all used in the correct context? What you're claiming about Whitmarsh is called a conspiracy theory by 9/10 people!

[racechick]

Then they're using the word incorectly. Its not a conspiracy.

[bud]

Then they're using the word incorectly. Its not a conspiracy.

Most of the English language is made up of words used incorrectly! why do you think the journalist from planetf1 write a story about conspiracy theories and it's content was about the exact accusations you have made about Whitmarsh?

What you are suggesting is called a conspiracy theory whether it's all Whitmarsh on his own or not.

[racechick]

You may call it that. But its not that. I cant help it if people are unable to use the English language correctly.

The planet F1 guy just wrotre a page of rubbish, perhaps he couldnt think what else to write. I hear its not gone down too well on the site.