- 28 Jan 12, 18:59#289063
Some of those reasons are just an example of how fecked up the human race can be though. And you could make a pretty damn strong argument that a lot of those examples are due to environment rather than genetics. You seem to be suggesting that bud's view is somehow factually flawed or inappropriate, which is perhaps fallacious in itself (i think this whole discussion probably is actually, haha). ALL species have to reproduce...
Ultimate reason for all life forms partnering up and having umpalumpa is to reproduce. No one has a choice in that urge as much as you have a choice in being born. Call it love all you like simple fact of the matter is passing on your genes is what its all about.
Homosexuals are attracted to the same umpalumpa, now this won't help reproduction something is amiss chemically with them but again they have no choice in this, they are what they are.
You fell for a common fallacy: not all schmex is for reproduction, in some species it's actually a minor reason. There are many, many examples in Mother Nature where it is evident that a couple (of whichever gender) 'do it' for other reasons: pleasure, payment for goods or actions such as support in something against something or somebody, friendship, submission, domination, appeasement, consolation, even jealousy or deception come to mind and many more.
Some of those reasons are just an example of how fecked up the human race can be though. And you could make a pretty damn strong argument that a lot of those examples are due to environment rather than genetics. You seem to be suggesting that bud's view is somehow factually flawed or inappropriate, which is perhaps fallacious in itself (i think this whole discussion probably is actually, haha). ALL species have to reproduce...
Rising number one of Formula 1, Juan - Juan, one wonders should Juan only win one Formula 1 one year, would Juan have won that one in round one, Juan??