FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#288228
ESPNF1:

Paul Hembery has revealed that Pirelli will be "more aggressive" in 2012 because it helped the teams by always using a soft compound at each race last season.

Despite Sebastian Vettel dominating the championship in 2011, the season actually saw some of the most exciting racing as Pirelli's rapidly degrading tyres led to strategic challenges and facilitated overtaking. Speaking exclusively to ESPNF1 Hembery said that the supplier had actually used a constant compound throughout the year to help the teams, and that it wouldn't do the same in 2012.

"Well we made it a little bit easier for the teams by using a particular soft compound all through the season, so they always had a central product which allowed them to optimise either the chassis set-up or the driving style," Hembery said. "Another year we won't do that. We'll be mixing the compounds a lot more, the compounds will be more aggressive, performances will be more aggressive."

Hembery also said that Pirelli had finalised the tyres for 2012, but was fully prepared to alter them in order to supply the best possible compounds to improve the show this season.

"We've got the winter test sessions and we're producing tyres already for Melbourne and Malaysia so we'll wait and see those two races, providing there's no big surprises during winter testing. If we're in line with our expectations then great, if not then we've always got a few things ready to apply if we need to. So we try to keep a number of options open to us either being more aggressive or being more conservative if required, but it is something that we understand we might have to move and change. It's not just a fixed point and we just say 'Well our job's done, just get on with it'.

"We know that we can also have an impact on the racing and it's up to us to make sure that we're still challenging the teams. I think Martin Whitmarsh came out and was quite clear, he said 'We want Pirelli to keep challenging us'. Maybe his engineers might not agree with that! But the team principals have to look after the full package of what they're doing in Formula One and they know that if we can make the racing more interesting from our part then they obviously will do their bit elsewhere on the car and we're all obviously working in the same direction; all of us want to make exciting racing."



Looking forward to that :yes:
#288232
Does this mean more driving slow and tyre saving or less? If Whitmarsh wants it I would think it means more? :(
#288250
Pirelli see it as their job to engineer exciting racing through f****** with the tyres, get them tae f***. Get rid of the single supplier.
#288261
Yep. Couldnt agree more!
#288271
A single tyre supplier is so much better than having 2 suppliers. Somethings need to be standard in F1.


Agreed. Have people forgotten one of the key reasons why Ferrari were so bloody dominant in 2002 and 2004???? TYRE WARS!!!! :eek:

Nah thank you, I'm fine with just one supplier.
#288290
Ok, some things need to be standard but pirelli arent sticking to any standard and seem to think it's their job to make the racing exciting which it definitely is not.
#288296
Why not just have a time bomb in the tyres which will set off at any random time? "More aggressive"...lol
#288317
Why not just have a time bomb in the tyres which will set off at any random time? "More aggressive"...lol


wouldn't surprise me. The drivers will be going ultra slow on the corners to make their tyres last. The last driver left with four intact tyres on their car wins :hehe:
#288319
Having tyres that are basically designed to rapidly disintegrate goes against F1s whole green ethos they have right now.

If I had control I'd make it like the 05 season again, except no refuelling either. Make a grand prix a grand prix and not 3 or 4 sprint races in one.
#288331
Looking forward to that :yes:


:yes: I welcome the prospect of more unpredictability. Anyone who doesn't is mad :hehe:
#288339
Looking forward to that :yes:


:yes: I welcome the prospect of more unpredictability. Anyone who doesn't is mad :hehe:


It's happening already... the further along you get in your F1 career, the more you agree with Bernie. :hehe:
#288341
Looking forward to that :yes:


:yes: I welcome the prospect of more unpredictability. Anyone who doesn't is mad :hehe:


It's happening already... the further along you get in your F1 career, the more you agree with Bernie. :hehe:


I wouldn't go as far as sprinklers or cancelling Spa or any of those stupid ideas! I like the Pirelli tyres, makes the racing even better and creates a good new challenge for drivers and engineers alike. Now hopefully even the qualifying issue will be solved too :)
#288343
Looking forward to that :yes:


:yes: I welcome the prospect of more unpredictability. Anyone who doesn't is mad :hehe:


It's happening already... the further along you get in your F1 career, the more you agree with Bernie. :hehe:


I wouldn't go as far as sprinklers or cancelling Spa or any of those stupid ideas! I like the Pirelli tyres, makes the racing even better and creates a good new challenge for drivers and engineers alike. Now hopefully even the qualifying issue will be solved too :)


I said the further you get... you haven't gone that far yet. :twisted:

Actually I'm happy to see the qualifying fiasco solved most of all.
#288361
Why not just have a time bomb in the tyres which will set off at any random time? "More aggressive"...lol


wouldn't surprise me. The drivers will be going ultra slow on the corners to make their tyres last. The last driver left with four intact tyres on their car wins :hehe:


Yep. BOOORRRIIINNNGGG! Not the pinnacle of motor racing. Why not let F1 race properly agen and have a new race category called 'The Tyre Preservation Challenge.' TTPC, it has a ring to it.

See our F1 related articles too!