FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[bud]

Sometimes the eye is a good judge on how an F1 car might perform.

But then why are some good looking cars at the mid or back end of the field? I think its all in ones mind.

[texasmr2]

Sometimes the eye is a good judge on how an F1 car might perform.

But then why are some good looking cars at the mid or back end of the field? I think its all in ones mind.

Kinda like that good looking woman you wanna hook up with. Just because she is good looking does not mean she will be a good toss . Sorry that analogy was just a spur of the moment thought.

[What's Burning?]

Sometimes the eye is a good judge on how an F1 car might perform.

But then why are some good looking cars at the mid or back end of the field? I think its all in ones mind.

Kinda like that good looking woman you wanna hook up with. Just because she is good looking does not mean she will be a good toss . Sorry that analogy was just a spur of the moment thought.

You salad tosser you.

[oEdwardssx]

Hamilton deserves to stay

[texasmr2]

Hamilton deserves to stay

Deserving is one thing and wanting is another thing. IMHO LH is where he need's to be and I do not see him leaving anytime soon but this is F1 where even the unbelievable is possible.

[racechick]

Sometimes the eye is a good judge on how an F1 car might perform.

But then why are some good looking cars at the mid or back end of the field? I think its all in ones mind.

Kinda like that good looking woman you wanna hook up with. Just because she is good looking does not mean she will be a good toss . Sorry that analogy was just a spur of the moment thought.

You should not juge a book by its cover!! etc etc etc

[texasmr2]

Sometimes the eye is a good judge on how an F1 car might perform.

But then why are some good looking cars at the mid or back end of the field? I think its all in ones mind.

Kinda like that good looking woman you wanna hook up with. Just because she is good looking does not mean she will be a good toss . Sorry that analogy was just a spur of the moment thought.

You should not juge a book by its cover!! etc etc etc

Exactly and that is why I always read atleast the first chapter before deciding if the second chapter is worth my attention.

[racechick]

Sometimes the eye is a good judge on how an F1 car might perform.

But then why are some good looking cars at the mid or back end of the field? I think its all in ones mind.

Kinda like that good looking woman you wanna hook up with. Just because she is good looking does not mean she will be a good toss . Sorry that analogy was just a spur of the moment thought.

You should not juge a book by its cover!! etc etc etc

Exactly and that is why I always read atleast the first chapter before deciding if the second chapter is worth my attention.

Even if the book is more than twenty chapters long? That could be a little short sighted!

[texasmr2]

Sometimes the eye is a good judge on how an F1 car might perform.

But then why are some good looking cars at the mid or back end of the field? I think its all in ones mind.

Kinda like that good looking woman you wanna hook up with. Just because she is good looking does not mean she will be a good toss . Sorry that analogy was just a spur of the moment thought.

You should not juge a book by its cover!! etc etc etc

Exactly and that is why I always read atleast the first chapter before deciding if the second chapter is worth my attention.

Even if the book is more than twenty chapters long? That could be a little short sighted!

The first chapter in a book or conversation with some insight can lead one to know how it will end 90% of the time. Hell your not much much younger than me so I had hoped you would be more intuitive, wishful thinking I guess amongst other things.

[racechick]

Sometimes the eye is a good judge on how an F1 car might perform.

But then why are some good looking cars at the mid or back end of the field? I think its all in ones mind.

Kinda like that good looking woman you wanna hook up with. Just because she is good looking does not mean she will be a good toss . Sorry that analogy was just a spur of the moment thought.

You should not juge a book by its cover!! etc etc etc

Exactly and that is why I always read atleast the first chapter before deciding if the second chapter is worth my attention.

Even if the book is more than twenty chapters long? That could be a little short sighted!

The first chapter in a book or conversation with some insight can lead one to know how it will end 90% of the time. Hell your not much much younger than me so I had hoped you would be more intuitive, wishful thinking I guess amongst other things.

All depends what book you're reading Tex, all depends what
book you're readin! Dont waste your time on trash novels

[Hammer278]

Sometimes the eye is a good judge on how an F1 car might perform.

But then why are some good looking cars at the mid or back end of the field? I think its all in ones mind.

There, hope this makes it clearer.

Not all good looking cars are fast, but generally fast cars ARE good looking.

Something like not all fingers are thumbs, but all thumbs are fingers.

[l Schumacher l]

why would hamilton go to red bull? hes a mclaren man, and anyways it wouldnt be so good for red bull.

ive noticed that it seems that the team chemistry and in the end everything overall is cvontrolled the best by red bull atm.

if hamilton and vettel are in the same team they wont be able tp push someone as well,

it would be another hamilton alonso sitation.

they succeeed because they let their drivers drive, and vettel wins cause hes better than webber, they all win without pushing it overboard.

if mark webber leaves then MAYBE there would be a mix up.

id love to see rosberg @ redbull.

[LewEngBridewell]

id love to see rosberg @ redbull.

Rosberg really deserves a winning car by now. Fastest lap in his first race - Bahrain '06 in the Williams. Five years on, and he still hasn't won a race. He just hasn't had the tools capable of a proper fight at the front. He's proved he deserves one now.

[l Schumacher l]

id love to see rosberg @ redbull.

Rosberg really deserves a winning car by now. Fastest lap in his first race - Bahrain '06 in the Williams. Five years on, and he still hasn't won a race. He just hasn't had the tools capable of a proper fight at the front. He's proved he deserves one now.

but wouldnt you agree that up to this point hes wasted many years? hes already 26 and without a win the poor lad! wasted way too many years at williams.

with these rumors of webber out.

rosberg would be my pick.

[racechick]

why would hamilton go to red bull? hes a mclaren man, and anyways it wouldnt be so good for red bull.

ive noticed that it seems that the team chemistry and in the end everything overall is cvontrolled the best by red bull atm.

if hamilton and vettel are in the same team they wont be able tp push someone as well,

it would be another hamilton alonso sitation.

they succeeed because they let their drivers drive, and vettel wins cause hes better than webber, they all win without pushing it overboard.

if mark webber leaves then MAYBE there would be a mix up.

id love to see rosberg @ redbull.

Im not so sure the team chemistry is all sweetness and light at red Bull, it certainly wasnt last year. I also dont think there'd be a problem between Vetel and Hamilton. Alonso wanted favours and felt he deserved them by dint of his history, he couldnt handle a rookie team mate who could drive as fast and sometimes faster than him.. I think if vettel and hamilton were in the same team theyd know the score ..equal footing best man wins. I must admit thats a juicy thought even though i want lewis to stay ay McLaren.