- 29 May 11, 18:54#258047

darwin dali wrote:Looks like a bad hair day for LHA bad hair day? A bit harsh?
F1 and Motorsport Forums
darwin dali wrote:Looks like a bad hair day for LHA bad hair day? A bit harsh?
Peng wrote:One thing i want to know since i haven't seen anything relating to this.The cars collided which = a race incident,which is what he got done for.You can't have drivers trying overtakes form that deep.It was a silly move from a great driver ,thats coming form a Lewis fan
Did the contact between Massa and Hamilton actually cause damage to either car? we saw some damage i guess but it seemed more on Hamiltons car and nothing at all on Massa's, Ferrari haven't claimed otherwise from what i can see.
So the question is did Hamilton cause damage or did he get a penalty for touching wheels with Massa? from what has been said Massa went off the racing line when he crashed he didn't claim his car was damaged and that is what caused the crash.

billindenver wrote:darwin dali wrote:Looks like a bad hair day for LHA bad hair day? A bit harsh?
Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point. 
Peng wrote:One thing i want to know since i haven't seen anything relating to this.Massa's interview on speed seemed to suggest that the damage done is what caused his car not to turn in at the tunnel...putting him in the marbles and hence the wall. Considering it's Massa saying it, it's just as likely he overcooked the tunnel entrance and was too busy complaining at the top of his lungs to hold his line. Still, you could see barge boards or something departing his car while Lewis's tire was against it.....so who knows.
Did the contact between Massa and Hamilton actually cause damage to either car? we saw some damage i guess but it seemed more on Hamiltons car and nothing at all on Massa's, Ferrari haven't claimed otherwise from what i can see.
So the question is did Hamilton cause damage or did he get a penalty for touching wheels with Massa? from what has been said Massa went off the racing line when he crashed he didn't claim his car was damaged and that is what caused the crash.
McLaren wrote:I didn't think racing incidents got penalties and i am pretty sure the bbc commentators have the same exact thoughts on the subject.Peng wrote:One thing i want to know since i haven't seen anything relating to this.The cars collided which = a race incident,which is what he got done for.You can't have drivers trying overtakes form that deep.It was a silly move from a great driver ,thats coming form a Lewis fan
Did the contact between Massa and Hamilton actually cause damage to either car? we saw some damage i guess but it seemed more on Hamiltons car and nothing at all on Massa's, Ferrari haven't claimed otherwise from what i can see.
So the question is did Hamilton cause damage or did he get a penalty for touching wheels with Massa? from what has been said Massa went off the racing line when he crashed he didn't claim his car was damaged and that is what caused the crash.
nish2280 wrote:Is it not obvious? Pirelli make RedBull better tires than everyone else because they love Vettel's finger. Duh!No, because RB sends 50 cases of Red Bull to the Pirelli factory free of charge every month.
Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point. 
billindenver wrote:I personally didn't see any damage to Massa's car but ofcourse the camera isn't that close, Hamilton just seemed to nudge into him and than they kind of got stuck together for a few seconds but at no point did i see any noticable damage, the fact Hamiltons front wing seemed fine even though you could see parts flying off it shows how soft the touch between them was.Peng wrote:One thing i want to know since i haven't seen anything relating to this.Massa's interview on speed seemed to suggest that the damage done is what caused his car not to turn in at the tunnel...putting him in the marbles and hence the wall. Considering it's Massa saying it, it's just as likely he overcooked the tunnel entrance and was too busy complaining at the top of his lungs to hold his line. Still, you could see barge boards or something departing his car while Lewis's tire was against it.....so who knows.
Did the contact between Massa and Hamilton actually cause damage to either car? we saw some damage i guess but it seemed more on Hamiltons car and nothing at all on Massa's, Ferrari haven't claimed otherwise from what i can see.
So the question is did Hamilton cause damage or did he get a penalty for touching wheels with Massa? from what has been said Massa went off the racing line when he crashed he didn't claim his car was damaged and that is what caused the crash.
Peng wrote:McLaren wrote:I didn't think racing incidents got penalties and i am pretty sure the bbc commentators have the same exact thoughts on the subject.Peng wrote:One thing i want to know since i haven't seen anything relating to this.The cars collided which = a race incident,which is what he got done for.You can't have drivers trying overtakes form that deep.It was a silly move from a great driver ,thats coming form a Lewis fan
Did the contact between Massa and Hamilton actually cause damage to either car? we saw some damage i guess but it seemed more on Hamiltons car and nothing at all on Massa's, Ferrari haven't claimed otherwise from what i can see.
So the question is did Hamilton cause damage or did he get a penalty for touching wheels with Massa? from what has been said Massa went off the racing line when he crashed he didn't claim his car was damaged and that is what caused the crash.
If you don't want people attempting overtakes in Monaco than just ban overtaking on the track or just remove the track from the schedule, the track has very little places to overtake as it is and the places you can successfully overtake at will always come down to situations like that.
So you either ban overtaking in Monaco or allow "racing incidents" to occur.

Peng wrote:If they just allow drivers to knock others out of the way with no regard for whether or not the pass was even possible without contact.....Newey will simply design an aerodynamic front crash bumper and Red Bull can start punting anyone in front of them.McLaren wrote:I didn't think racing incidents got penalties and i am pretty sure the bbc commentators have the same exact thoughts on the subject.Peng wrote:One thing i want to know since i haven't seen anything relating to this.The cars collided which = a race incident,which is what he got done for.You can't have drivers trying overtakes form that deep.It was a silly move from a great driver ,thats coming form a Lewis fan
Did the contact between Massa and Hamilton actually cause damage to either car? we saw some damage i guess but it seemed more on Hamiltons car and nothing at all on Massa's, Ferrari haven't claimed otherwise from what i can see.
So the question is did Hamilton cause damage or did he get a penalty for touching wheels with Massa? from what has been said Massa went off the racing line when he crashed he didn't claim his car was damaged and that is what caused the crash.
If you don't want people attempting overtakes in Monaco than just ban overtaking on the track or just remove the track from the schedule, the track has very little places to overtake as it is and the places you can successfully overtake at will always come down to situations like that.
So you either ban overtaking in Monaco or allow "racing incidents" to occur.
Ineluke wrote:No other reason than to stir it up billthebender.The preference by the forum is that you do not warp a member's name as part of an attack, there are better ways to have a discussion and everyone here deserves the same level of respect whether we agree with them or not. Whether we agree with their tactics or not, or whether we agree with their intent or not.
billindenver wrote: I was given a board warning for spelling Hamilton's name wrong...
darwin dali wrote:Don't encourage them!nish2280 wrote:Is it not obvious? Pirelli make RedBull better tires than everyone else because they love Vettel's finger. Duh!No, because RB sends 50 cases of Red Bull to the Pirelli factory free of charge every month.
What's Burning? wrote:Well that is how you spell his name in Latin.Ineluke wrote:No other reason than to stir it up billthebender.The preference by the forum is that you do not warp a member's name as part of an attack, there are better ways to have a discussion and everyone here deserves the same level of respect whether we agree with them or not. Whether we agree with their tactics or not, or whether we agree with their intent or not.billindenver wrote: I was given a board warning for spelling Hamilton's name wrong...
No billindenver, you're not allowed your own facts you were warned for calling Lewis Hamilton a tw@t.
McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]
Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!