- 22 Apr 11, 11:30#252859

People seem to have trouble differentiating between "making the most of what your given" and "Vettel is as good as Senna"
To ask questions with no factual answer in any walk of life or subject, stats only mean so much, you have to take everything that can be stripped of information in determining the question in hand.
As such, i dont KNOW, not dont THINK or WANT, i dont KNOW, if Vettel is as good as Senna, because the criteria on which i (and most others should if they want a well rounded take on it) base the question on, hasnt really come to fruition, it should do, but isnt definite, by the time Vettels career is near an end, same with any other driver.
The car Vettels in is, and when hes won always has been, dominant. You can like that or lump that especially Vettel fans on here (vlad, nish), Vettel hasnt won unless his car is the best on the day. Is this his fault, no, of course not, and he still has to drive it to the flag, which he does remarkably and better then anyone in F1 if you ask me. BUT THIS IS IRRELEVANT, because it isnt whats being adressed here, its whether Vettel is as good as Senna isnt it?
What is comparable is that Senna also won 2 championships in a car that was quite clearly the class of the field, in 88, and 91, the other year it was class of the field Prost beat him, and the year after that it was oer the course of the year, equal with Prosts Ferrari. So he has won when the car isnt dominant. I want to see Vettel do well (obviously not win, especially if Hamiltons the other WDC contender!) when hes in a car that has to fight for wins, or he at least has to fight for his pole before he f**** off and leaves the others in his dust!

Tiger woods and Lewis Hamilton- idols and legends!
Mclaren- the past, present and forever!
Mclaren- the past, present and forever!