FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
User avatar
By Jamie
#245700
McLaren are hoping that last-minute upgrades to their 2011 car will bring an improvement of up to one second per lap at this weekend’s Australian Grand Prix, relative to their pre-season testing form.

By their own admission, McLaren’s test programme with the MP4-26 has not gone to plan, but team principal Martin Whitmarsh is now confident that the late revisions, principally to the car’s floor and exhaust, will provide a significant performance boost.

“I’m not satisfied with where the car was on reliability or performance in the tests,” said Whitmarsh in a Vodafone McLaren Mercedes Phone-In. “We have made some fairly dramatic changes, and those changes we’ll see in Australia. There’s some risk in that, but I think it was the right thing to do and we’re hoping that risk comes off and that the car is a lot more competitive.”

Like several of their rivals, McLaren’s latest machine had employed a quite complex floor and exhaust system, in a bid to claw back some of the downforce lost through the ban on double diffusers. However, after trailing key rivals Red Bull and Ferrari in testing, Whitmarsh said the team had opted to simplify their design in order to improve reliability.

“The exhaust systems have become quite extreme on quite a lot of the cars,” he explained. “I think we in particular had a very extreme solution, but they were not delivering, in my opinion, sufficient benefit for their complexity.

“We had some very creative ideas, some of which could have worked spectacularly well, but to work spectacularly well they had to be sufficiently durable to be raceable. Frankly, some of our solutions weren’t and that’s why I think we had to go back. But I think in doing so we found some interesting performance.”

McLaren opted for a later launch of the MP4-26, instead choosing to use the first of the year’s pre-season tests to accumulate Pirelli tyre data using an interim version of last year’s MP4-25. However, after hitting a number of problems with the new car, Whitmarsh admitted that the unexpectedly late start to the new season could prove to be a blessing.

“It could be very crucial, but we’ll be able to answer that in the next few days,” he said. “We’ve been able to significantly change the car. If the car is reliable and quick then this will have been crucial.”

If McLaren can find the pace they expect from their updated car, they could have a chance of winning for the second year running at Albert Park following Lewis Hamilton’s 2010 success. Hamilton’s team mate, Jenson Button, won the 2009 race for Brawn GP.

“The changes are aimed at making the car over a second quicker than it was in the tests,” confirmed Whitmarsh.

- Source - <-- EDITED FOR CONTENT --> / http://www.f1.com -
Last edited by myownalias on 22 Mar 11, 18:04, edited 2 times in total.Reason: VB - Stop plugging your own site; and/or passing articles off as your own can get you in hot water (legally) - final warning!
By Hammer278
#245712
Big talk from Whitmarsh! A second is usually gained in around half a season...he wants this in 2 extra weeks. We'll see. :hehe:
By Gaz
#245733
McLaren are hoping that last-minute upgrades to their 2011 car will bring an improvement of up to one second per lap at this weekend’s Australian Grand Prix, relative to their pre-season testing form.

By their own admission, McLaren’s test programme with the MP4-26 has not gone to plan, but team principal Martin Whitmarsh is now confident that the late revisions, principally to the car’s floor and exhaust, will provide a significant performance boost.

“I’m not satisfied with where the car was on reliability or performance in the tests,” said Whitmarsh in a Vodafone McLaren Mercedes Phone-In. “We have made some fairly dramatic changes, and those changes we’ll see in Australia. There’s some risk in that, but I think it was the right thing to do and we’re hoping that risk comes off and that the car is a lot more competitive.”

Like several of their rivals, McLaren’s latest machine had employed a quite complex floor and exhaust system, in a bid to claw back some of the downforce lost through the ban on double diffusers. However, after trailing key rivals Red Bull and Ferrari in testing, Whitmarsh said the team had opted to simplify their design in order to improve reliability.

“The exhaust systems have become quite extreme on quite a lot of the cars,” he explained. “I think we in particular had a very extreme solution, but they were not delivering, in my opinion, sufficient benefit for their complexity.

“We had some very creative ideas, some of which could have worked spectacularly well, but to work spectacularly well they had to be sufficiently durable to be raceable. Frankly, some of our solutions weren’t and that’s why I think we had to go back. But I think in doing so we found some interesting performance.”

McLaren opted for a later launch of the MP4-26, instead choosing to use the first of the year’s pre-season tests to accumulate Pirelli tyre data using an interim version of last year’s MP4-25. However, after hitting a number of problems with the new car, Whitmarsh admitted that the unexpectedly late start to the new season could prove to be a blessing.

“It could be very crucial, but we’ll be able to answer that in the next few days,” he said. “We’ve been able to significantly change the car. If the car is reliable and quick then this will have been crucial.”

If McLaren can find the pace they expect from their updated car, they could have a chance of winning for the second year running at Albert Park following Lewis Hamilton’s 2010 success. Hamilton’s team mate, Jenson Button, won the 2009 race for Brawn GP.

“The changes are aimed at making the car over a second quicker than it was in the tests,” confirmed Whitmarsh.

- Source - <-- EDITED FOR CONTENT --> -


Wow you wrote that yourself?

looks awfully simlar to the same article on formula1.com you wanna be carfull passing off copyrighted work as your own you'll get Bernie on to you.

And thats no joke mate.
User avatar
By Jamie
#245757
I changed the i to I my work :hehe:


I'm on a forum? I want traffic....
By Gaz
#245801
I changed the i to I my work :hehe:


I'm on a forum? I want traffic....


Yeh but your passing off another writers work as your own.

1. Thats Morally Low.
2. Its against the LAW
3. Its Ecclestones Site.

Eccelstone once found out somone was selling couterfit Brabham t-shirts (his f1 team) so he trashed the stall and robbed the t-shirts.

i wouldn't mess.
User avatar
By texasmr2
#245817
Gaz your the new forum 'Deputy Sheriff', good work. :D
User avatar
By Jamie
#245818
I changed the i to I my work :hehe:


I'm on a forum? I want traffic....


Yeh but your passing off another writers work as your own.

1. Thats Morally Low.
2. Its against the LAW
3. Its Ecclestones Site.

Eccelstone once found out somone was selling couterfit Brabham t-shirts (his f1 team) so he trashed the stall and robbed the t-shirts.

i wouldn't mess.



Bring it on, I will only mug him again :rofl:
By Gaz
#245835
Gaz your the new forum 'Deputy Sheriff', good work. :D


Nothing to do with the Forum, you can't rip other writers work that way i'm so sick of these shitty f1 blogs popping up which are full of crappy copy-past article's any monkey can do that.
User avatar
By texasmr2
#245837
Gaz your the new forum 'Deputy Sheriff', good work. :D


Nothing to do with the Forum, you can't rip other writers work that way i'm so sick of these shitty f1 blogs popping up which are full of crappy copy-past article's any monkey can do that.

I agree :) .
User avatar
By Jamie
#245841
True, but. It is hard to write decent stuff when I have no time, It is my personal site. I am no writer! I want to inform people on my favourite sport!
User avatar
By Jamie
#245845
jeez VB every article on your site is a cocking copy paste of another websites work.

:nono:



The captain blog is not, also on the first pages they are my own work :thumbup: But I want true info, not the crap people write! I genrally source the info first and give credit. It is somewhere!


YAY My first visitor :P
By Gaz
#245852
jeez VB every article on your site is a cocking copy paste of another websites work.

:nono:



The captain blog is not, also on the first pages they are my own work :thumbup: But I want true info, not the crap people write! I genrally source the info first and give credit. It is somewhere!


YAY My first visitor :P


Oh you wrote an about me page.

Sorry i stand corrected your site is awsome.
User avatar
By Jensonb
#245895
True, but. It is hard to write decent stuff when I have no time, It is my personal site. I am no writer! I want to inform people on my favourite sport!

Unfortunately, it doesn't matter. if it's publicly viewable, you can't claim, or even make it appear, that it's yours unless it is. My website is made up entirely of things I've produced, so should yours. Anything else is illegal.

See our F1 related articles too!