I'm watching.
Wasn't as good as I first thought, and whats with this behind the lens bullpoo.
Overall though, the sort of thing I really appreciate the bbc for.
Particularly liked the footage of the Mongolian step and the nomadic horse riding cattle herders not too dissimilar from what Genghis Khan rose from, pity it was so short.
Maybe they should have done it more from cultures, than natural environments?
I think the whole point is to show how us humans adapt to our environment, not so much about individual cultures,
I guess so, just I'd prefer to see it about the study of people living non-western lifestyles, but I agree, it clearly has a focus on geography,
my brother works for the BBC, he says that the amount of cash they have for production costs is amazing. Look at Top Gear, dragging them off to far-flung places with all that gear isn't cheap. It's worth it though, the beeb has THE best programmes.
It sure won't be cheap, must take ages to research as well, but I wonder if cutbacks have had an effect and surely the behind the lens segment is just filler?
I know I sound critical, but its more a similar disappoint I had after subsequent viewings of Merlin, this clearly had a good concept, whoever sat down and wrote it was onto something, but after a while it dawned on me that it wasn't what it had promised to be. It was actually quite superficial,a bit "lighweight".