- 13 Feb 11, 18:24#239132I'm just going off times and driver/team quotes that have been posted on the autosport website (for the most part). Some drivers have stated what they've been on for certain runs and alluded to certain characteristics, etc. It is equally possible that these drivers who have been doing long consistent runs haven't been pushing the tyres at all, and so it could be argued that such times are not representative either. I do realise Jerez is somewhat hard on tyres though - but still much like quite a few tracks on the calendar! So i know what i said (well, about cars stopping 4 times) does go to extremes of what is possible, but it's nevertheless still possible (again, who predicted such wear at Canada last year!?).
Pirelli have stated this today: "To get away from that, you've got to almost force them to a point where the main choice of tyre can last around 100-110km in a race, considering that most races are between 300-320km." Their wording suggests to me that they think that this is what they expect the harder (main) tyres to last at best, so what of the soft tyres? The difference in pace between the supers and hards is around 3 seconds. Now, i know they only have a one step gap to deal with during races but that still leaves quite a pace difference, arguably enough to leave open the possibility of aggresive strateges on mainly softer compound tyres. It's possible, and this is all i'm getting at. I don't deny the possibility of that not actually proving to be the case in the end, but i maintain that it can still easily go either way from what i have seen so far.
Rising number one of Formula 1, Juan - Juan, one wonders should Juan only win one Formula 1 one year, would Juan have won that one in round one, Juan??