Its' something i feel really strongly about. But I can see your point of view. The fact that you believe one driver can be selected as the prime racer for that team and everyone has to help that driver. I can see it but i dont like it or think its fair.
Why isnt it going to be in a teams interest? It happened last year when it was banned so why should it not happen this year when its legal?
I did post previously about the generational divide, which WB has also acknowledged. He also raises the cultural issue as well, which I agree is relevant.
I think a large part of the issue lies in our perceptions of the hierarchy that exists within the team. The hierarchy I refer to consists of the team, driver A and driver B. Ferrari, Massa and Alonso. I see that structure as being:-
The team goal is not to promote a particular driver, but to ensure winning, this is primary and is above either driver.
TO1.png
I think your view is like this:-
Where the team promotes Alonso always
TO2.png
I guess I would ask you this question, if Alonso's or his car had a problem at a race and Felipe was closing in on him as well as Vettel. And if on the current lap times both Felipe and Vettel would catch Nando, do you think Ferrari as a team would take the risk and tell Felipe to hold position (and risk getting either one or both cars passed or perhaps even being penalized for blocking) or do you think they would order Felipe past and take the guaranteed win?
I know they would tell Felipe to pass and it would be done in a heartbeat. No hesitation.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.