- 02 Feb 11, 07:55#237262
well i must admit i didnt watch f1 at that point so maybe im wrong to make that judgement, but yeah 
The irony is that F1 cars are easier to drive now than they were when it was commonplace for the majority of drivers to be aged 30+
On the thread topic; Heidfeld had a good run in F1; he was a solid second driver but never a team leader, I feel he is being left behind with all the young guns around!
well there is the point of having new talent around, but what makes it really sad there is people like narkiyan ( or whatever his name is), with less talent than my A%^!, and decent driver cant find a drive
This is way out of line. Were you watching F1 when he drove for Jordan?
I don't understand the hostility towards Narain, yet people hype up Chandok just because he's a great commentator. Narain performed a lot better during his Jordan times than Chandok did with Hispania. The Jordan was as much of a dog as the Hispania was, and he was easily outperforming Glock that year in qualifying and races! Glock is not some average driver, while Bruno Sennas best accomplishment in racing is being born as his uncle's nephew.
The criticism levelled at Narain is due to running out of steam at the end of the season when Glock started getting the upper hand. That was put down to his lack of fitness, which he addressed in his interview after signing with HRT.
Give him a chance before comparing him with your arse.
Erm... FYI, Glock was never Narain's teammate. He drove for Jordan in 2005, his teammate was Tiago Monteiro, who beated him in a regular basis. Narain did nothing noteworthy that season. So yes, his arse is a total waste of space on the grid Funny that this discussion arises on a thread about a driver with gazillion times more talent than Narain, but who apparently doesn't deserve a seat in F1 because he's "too old" and stuff.


Tiger woods and Lewis Hamilton- idols and legends!
Mclaren- the past, present and forever!
Mclaren- the past, present and forever!