- 13 Jan 11, 06:48#234294
Was just reading Stefano's comments:
The 45-year-old expressed his hopes, finally, for a greater degree of overtaking in F1 2011, thanks to the return following two decades away of Pirelli and the softer, less durable tyres the Italian manufacturer is planning to bring compared to its predecessor Bridgestone. Forecasting a substantial impact upon the racing, Domenicali also predicted an impact from the new adjustable rear wing – although whether that impact will be a positive or negative one, he is less sure.
“On the rear tyres there are still some steps to be done,” he acknowledged, pointing to the relative dearth of pre-season testing time to perfect them and admitting that he hopes for some vital wet running before the in-season ban kicks in, “but this year, qualifying should not be as important as it was last season. Last season was very interesting and competitive, but there wasn’t a lot of overtaking. This is a fundamental aspect which must be worked on.
“The driver running behind another one will be able to activate [the rear wing] to get in the slipstream only at determined points around the track, and only if the gap between himself and his rival is very tight. It will be up to race direction to signal the possibility with a light in the cockpit.
“However, I wonder – besides helping overtaking, will this system make the duels more spectacular or too predictable? At the moment I’m a bit sceptical, but I hope to be wrong. I also hope that the TVs find a way to make people understand on-screen who has activated the mechanism and who hasn’t, otherwise you won’t understand a thing anymore...”
_____________________________________
Does anyone feel this dumbs down the concept of 'racing'? For example, Fernando in a slower Ferrari holding Lewis back in a McLaren which is (at that point of the race) stronger and Lewis simply flies by using this technology. Where's the merit of the overtake? The driver in front always has the excuse that the rear wing rule was in favour and there's nothing to do.
IMO, if a driver holds back another faster driver for x number of laps it would add to credibility and racing skills of the 'defender' as well. This new concept steals this away from the driver not only defending, but attacking as well. The overtakes would lose value and we can never say "Driver X is a tough guy to overtake" anymore.
This is a stupid rule.
The 45-year-old expressed his hopes, finally, for a greater degree of overtaking in F1 2011, thanks to the return following two decades away of Pirelli and the softer, less durable tyres the Italian manufacturer is planning to bring compared to its predecessor Bridgestone. Forecasting a substantial impact upon the racing, Domenicali also predicted an impact from the new adjustable rear wing – although whether that impact will be a positive or negative one, he is less sure.
“On the rear tyres there are still some steps to be done,” he acknowledged, pointing to the relative dearth of pre-season testing time to perfect them and admitting that he hopes for some vital wet running before the in-season ban kicks in, “but this year, qualifying should not be as important as it was last season. Last season was very interesting and competitive, but there wasn’t a lot of overtaking. This is a fundamental aspect which must be worked on.
“The driver running behind another one will be able to activate [the rear wing] to get in the slipstream only at determined points around the track, and only if the gap between himself and his rival is very tight. It will be up to race direction to signal the possibility with a light in the cockpit.
“However, I wonder – besides helping overtaking, will this system make the duels more spectacular or too predictable? At the moment I’m a bit sceptical, but I hope to be wrong. I also hope that the TVs find a way to make people understand on-screen who has activated the mechanism and who hasn’t, otherwise you won’t understand a thing anymore...”
_____________________________________
Does anyone feel this dumbs down the concept of 'racing'? For example, Fernando in a slower Ferrari holding Lewis back in a McLaren which is (at that point of the race) stronger and Lewis simply flies by using this technology. Where's the merit of the overtake? The driver in front always has the excuse that the rear wing rule was in favour and there's nothing to do.
IMO, if a driver holds back another faster driver for x number of laps it would add to credibility and racing skills of the 'defender' as well. This new concept steals this away from the driver not only defending, but attacking as well. The overtakes would lose value and we can never say "Driver X is a tough guy to overtake" anymore.
This is a stupid rule.
Breaking News:Lewis Hamilton has officially overtaken The Fonz in race wins. With 88 races less. Lol(Without a specially built blown diffuser, illegal front wing, preferential treatment)