FORUMula1.com

[stonemonkey]

That will be very cool when it comes along but I think 18 months is being a little optimistic.

[darwin dali]

That will be very cool when it comes along but I think 18 months is being a little optimistic.

[SennaVille]

It's like any new innovation, there's going to be a few hiccups along the way. Eventually though, we're going to look at each other and say, "What did we do before......!".

Simon Cowell!!!

[Robert12010]

do i want a 3d tv?, UH NOO!!

[What's Burning?]

re-runs of I Love Lucy in 3D are going to be GREAT!

[Robert12010]

It's like any new innovation, there's going to be a few hiccups along the way. Eventually though, we're going to look at each other and say, "What did we do before......!".

Simon Cowell!!!

[Jabberwocky]

*censored* in 3D could have some worrying moments

[Jensonb]

That will be very cool when it comes along but I think 18 months is being a little optimistic.

Yeah, 18 months is a very very unrealistic timeframe.

[Stealthgate007]

I just bought a 55 inch led lcd 240hz last year.. I have another 5yrs or so to make a decision on a TV and hopefully holography will be out.

[texasmr2]

and hopefully holography will be out.

I read something about that in the paper a few months ago, should be very interesting to see how it looks. I believe the article mentioned that it would be atleast be about 5yr's before it was market ready.

[F1er]

Has anyone seen *censored* in 3D???

[Jensonb]

Gotta be honest, I think holography is going to be thoroughly underwhelming. The early demos I've seen of it are pretty pants.

[stonemonkey]

Well, still no holographic TV and no practical glasses free 3D systems. Anyone else gone 3D?
Had mine for a few months now and like it for the occasional movie and a bit of gaming, nature documentaries look amazing shot in 3D.
It's not something I use particularly often but glad I got it and have the option.

[darwin dali]

I've had it for 4 years now. Passive glasses, i.e., light-weight, up-conversion 2D->3D on the fly (cool). I like it.

[stonemonkey]

I went for passive too, the only downside being the reduced resolution but that was far outweighed by the advantages over active IMO. Not got 2D-3D conversion but not really too bothered by that.

One thing I think though, things like nature programme have been shot with camera setups to suit TVs and look fantastic on the tv whereas movies have been shot with setups to suit large cinema screens so when viewed on TV the 3D effect can be a bit weaker. A bigger screen is definitely an advantage there, I've seen stuff on a 55 or 56" screen and it is a bit better than my 42".