FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
User avatar
By spankyham
#232148
Some early images of Ferrari's 2011 car, the F11, were published first by Marca (paper edition) about a week before Xmas with more on their website.

Image

This is probably a pretty bad translation :-) taken from this URL http://www.marca.com/2010/12/18/motor/formula1/
1292688236.html (you need to cut and paste the URL and get rid of the CR to get it to work because for some reason it doesn't like the redirect from our Forum):-
When you think of Ferrari recently what is it's originality? Brawn and double diffuser in 2009, McLaren F duct and the areo of Red Bull in 2010, have been trend setting elements in Formula 1 with Ferrari and the other teams forced to play catch-up.

Ferrari's goal in 2011 is to set trends. You have to set trends, the others can try and follow us. "When our technical director Aldo Costa, spoke about our design, I wanted to encourage him and all our engineers to push the theme of innovation, which, in Formula 1 means exploring all areas to the limits set by the rules, "said Stefano Domenicali.

Ferrari did it between 2000 and 2004, five years of triumph in what was the beacon for the other teams that imitated from one year to another the best inventions. This led to the conquest of 14 world titles in the last 11 years. To get back to this success map, we want our car from Maranello, starting next January 25th, competitive from the first race without any hiccups, like this season.

With the new regulations and clarified goal of the Scuderia (what we want from the car), we will see if the car we will call either the F2011 or F11, can be distinguished by eye from it's rivals, especially in the central and rear sections, where most new innovations are concentrated.

In this approach, conducted by the prestigious technical journalist and designer Paolo D'Alessio, nose or nose, should have a more pronounced trend, with two long vertical drifts and two bumps visible on the top. The front wing, which can not be moved from the steering wheel as this year, will feature a new design of the flaps and vertical sides.

However, the new principals arrive according to the center, where the more radical solutions begin. Starting with the sides, which have a substantially difference to the F10. It is presumed that the air intake high and tilted forward to a redesign of the bottom to increase air flow to cool the engine compartment and radiator cores.

Air for KERS
A small, on the bottom, to the kers compartment cannot be ruled out. In 2009 it was close to 30 kilos with batteries included. Ferrari has independently developed an improved version with better performance than the standard version, and slightly smaller batteries. Moreover, according to Pat Symonds, a former chief engineer of Renault, Ferrari will have an interconnected suspension, which should better distribute the weight of the car on four wheels for stability.

Different in the initial part, the sides also differ in the area near the drive wheels. Mainly by the sharp decline in its line to the end zone, the style of the McLaren. Here you can see the influence of the Adrian Newey Red Bull which the F10 ended with this season.

Although the double diffuser is prohibited in 2011, it is assumed that all the teams running blown exhausts will keep them, if only because this solution has been shown to contribute to the extraction of air from the rear, increasing the downforce on the rear. This area is fairly important new aerodynamic triangular element, which is configured as an important element in the new car.

The air guide, key
From here, just look up to find what could characterize the Ferrari 2011. The FIA is loaded twice F Duct diffuser and rear wing betting on a mobile phone and is in the area where Cavallino technicians should make a difference with solutions never seen before in this sport. What is it? "Bearing in mind that to be clear about the use of the rear wing will have to wait until the first races of 2011, it is clear that their exploitation with the kers, engineers expect even greater benefits than with the F duct.

This talk of a standard car fitted with the classic spine, but if the latter finally apply a subsequent air guiding element, which could be triangular placed after the entry of air into the engine-double as a spectacular wing could accelerate the flow directed to the rear wing. This new flap working in conjunction with the mobile-upper rear wing, so to speak, but has not yet been determined if they can touch each other or not. In any case, would use to test the new regulations, flying straight at Ferrari.

With numbers in hand, if they can gain 50 or 60 horsepower for 6.7 seconds per lap with kers, the adoption of the mobile rear wing and the flow guide can also bring an increase of over 100 hp. These very respectable figures would give Ferrari an edge.

In fact this feature could be hidden until the final preseason test so as not to let it be copied, but if its successful, it would be one of those elements to copy, but this time by rivals.
User avatar
By spankyham
#232149
Ferrari has passed it's initial monocoque test.

Ferrari's 2011 chassis has passed a sequence of crucial crash tests, according to Italian media reports.

The mandatory monocoque tests reportedly took place under FIA guidelines and in the presence of an official observer at the CSI technical facility in Bollate, near Milan.

The reports cited rumours that the outcome of the tests was a relief to Ferrari's Aldo Costa-led design team, due to fundamental differences between the F10 and its successor.

A key difference, said the reports, is in the new monocoque's actual construction and composite materials, which are more extreme for 2011.

Ferrari's crash test chief Davide Terletti reportedly investigated a crack that opened on the surface of the monocoque, but the detail was not enough to cause the chassis to fail the tests.

The reports said other parts of the 2011 car will be crash tested shortly.
User avatar
By texasmr2
#232157
Wonder if anyone will protest the winglets on the engine cover fin. They do look cool though.

Wow I did not notice until you mentioned them, very cool looking and in theory a great concept for added downforce and air flow over the rear wing.

Thanks Spanky :thumbup: .
Last edited by texasmr2 on 30 Dec 10, 17:18, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By scotty
#232160
Saw these a while back, i'd be amazed if that is real in any shape or form.
By vaptin
#232171
Saw these a while back, i'd be amazed if that is real in any shape or form.


So would I, that's way too much information.

The quotes are probably true, but they aren't anything specific, and possibly smoke and daggers.

Good read though Spanky.
User avatar
By nish2280
#232172
Splitter seems bigger than usual, maybe its just my eyes deceiving me.

Also quite interesting that the drawing shows a under-the-nose splitter which Williams ran towards the end of 2009 and then ditched it, followed by McLaren copying it for 2010 and then ditching it after a few races.

Edit: Is there a small opening under the main air intake? If you look at the head-on view you can see a small black bit, which im guessing is one of two things: cooling for KERS or opening for the possible use of ground effects.
User avatar
By bud
#232176
Do you mean on the side pod? I can't see an opening under the air intake. The one on the side pod would be for cooling of the KERS system.
User avatar
By stonemonkey
#232178
I thought the vanes outside the sidepods were now disallowed, the teams using them for the mirrors had to move the mirrors to the cockpit and were only allowed to keep the vanes for the remainder of the 2010 season.
By JackMaster
#232180
I also find hard to believe that Ferrari have released so much information about his new car. It’s likelier they’re trying to confuse their rivals.
I’ve read the Marca’s article and you’ve made a pretty accurate translation, Spanky. You’re really good with idioms.
User avatar
By nish2280
#232195
Do you mean on the side pod? I can't see an opening under the air intake. The one on the side pod would be for cooling of the KERS system.


Yup, sorry, i meant side pod.
User avatar
By Flux
#232415
while really interesting, especially the comparison images. its a shame but they have to be fake right ? no chance ferrari would release that much information.
User avatar
By Jensonb
#232418
Interesting that the article stresses how Ferrari were trying to make this car a trend-setter not a trend-follower...And the car clearly borrows the McLaren Sidepod Airbox design ethos. :thumbup:
User avatar
By scotty
#232421
Two things here, that i should have mentioned in my first post.

That fin would be illegal, for a couple of reasons but the easiest one is that body work isn't allowed to contact the rear wing anymore.

Those huge cooling openings on the sidepods are COMPLETELY ridiculous. Why would they suddenly need double the air coming in there? Answer: they won't.

The drawings also omit several (albeit small) details from last year's Ferrari that you would perhaps expect a reputable source to have included.
User avatar
By spankyham
#232886
Something interesting on Ferrari passing their monocoque test so early. As the article mentions there are new composite materials. I think Ferrari submitted much earlier than normal because they have some innovations here - possibly related to some of these newish intelligent materials. As I understand these offer significant construction opportunities for engineers because they feature memories - they can distort to differing shapes yet can memorise their original shapes.

By submitting the chassis much earlier than normal for Ferrari, they could get an OK from the FiA by passing the test. Also, once chassis have passed this test they can't be changed - if Ferrari do have some innovations here it would be hard for other teams to copy in 2011 as the chassis can't be changed. If the FiA had a problem with the Ferrari chassis and its new materials, submitting early would give Ferrari time to change to more conventional materials.

That fin would be illegal, for a couple of reasons but the easiest one is that body work isn't allowed to contact the rear wing anymore.

Looks like its overhanging, and close, but also side image to me shows it actually not touching.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 15

See our F1 related articles too!