FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#220085
Horner: McLaren used Button as 'a sacrificial lamb'

Christian Horner has accused Red Bull Racing's F1 2010 title rivals McLaren-Mercedes of using Jenson Button as 'a sacrificial lamb' in last weekend's Japanese Grand Prix at Suzuka to aid Lewis Hamilton's bid for world championship glory – at the expense of his own.

The only driver inside the top ten on the starting grid to begin the race on the harder 'Option' tyres, Button was able to run longer than any of his immediate rivals before pitting, and leapfrogged RBR pairing Sebastian Vettel and Mark Webber into the lead when the duo made their own stops on laps 24 and 25 respectively.

As the German and Australian closed the gap, however, Horner contends that Button slowed his pace at the behest of his team in an effort to back the two Red Bulls up towards Fernando Alonso and Hamilton behind and secure his fellow Brit a chance of attacking them, albeit in so doing severely compromising his own chances despite theoretically being the better-placed of the two countrymen in the race.

The energy drinks-backed outfit's team principal believes McLaren deliberately delayed the defending world champion's scheduled pit-stop to that very end – with just Kamui Kobayashi and Jaime Alguersuari coming in later – only for Hamilton's subsequent gearbox issue to put paid to the plan.

“We were a bit concerned by Jenson's race strategy, as we knew we would come out behind him and then he started to back everybody up towards Hamilton,” Horner told The Daily Telegraph. “It was sort of like being in a McLaren sandwich, but then it looked like Hamilton developed a problem and they aborted that strategy for Jenson. It looked a little bit like he was a sacrificial lamb. I don't know. It just seemed strange.”

McLaren team principal Martin Whitmarsh, however, has offered short shrift to such a notion, denying electing to hamper one of his drivers in order to help the other, and conceding that whilst using Button in such a role had been an option, the objective of the unusual strategy was to give the nine-time grand prix-winner the best opportunity to gain ground after changing over to the softer 'Prime' rubber.

“Yes, there was [the possibility to use Button as a roadblock], but at that point we also had to consider Jenson,” the Englishman reflected. “We wanted to give him enough time on the Option tyre, to have a go. If we had left him out there longer...it is not how we play our game. Maybe others would, but that is not how we go motor racing.

“Ultimately, that strategy didn't come off as best as we'd have liked, because the others' Option tyres didn't fall away as quickly as we'd anticipated. Still, we feel it was a strategic choice worth taking. After switching to Options, Jenson showed excellent pace, and I think we had the second-fastest car [in the race].”

http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/12102010/ ... -lamb.html
#220089
hehe. Noting wrong with some little mind games...

I really like this pic though:
http://en.espnf1.com/redbull/motorsport ... 31015.html

Great stance to play mindgames with. The equivalent of Vettel pointing at the Suzuka sign on Webber :P Webber had no choice but to smile... :thumbup:


he looks so smug :D:D


but yeh theirs no substance to the story its just mind games, im sure mclaren are well versed in dealing with those by now
#220090
The thought had occurred to me during the race but a problem I have with it is if they went to the extent of doing that wouldn't they have also thought of some way of getting Hamilton past Button early on?
#220092
I noticed as soon as you heard Lewis' gearbox stuff up they brought Jenson straight into the pits and by then he was way behind Fernando. Does anyone know how far in front of Fernando was Jenson 10 laps prior to him coming in the pits? When it was happening I thought the exact same thing as what Christian Horner is saying now.
#220097
In my best Victor Meldrew voice "I don't believe it"; I believe the choice to start the race on the prime tyre was Jenson's; he has shown that he is willing to take tactical risks to get a better result; the two calls in the rain earlier in the season and the choice to run the F-Duct on Monza; this time it simply didn't pay off; it's just Horner running his mouth; trying to distract his rivals from their own developmental and strategist plans!
#220102
I think this is what McLaren were trying to do in the race, but I have no problems with it. It's a fantastic strategy - and if Jenson had a say in it then he is a master-tactician and should be running his own team one day. :thumbup:

I think it would have worked too, which would have been fantastic if Hamilton overtook Alonso but couldn't reach the Red Bulls. :twisted: It's a great call when you think about it - Hamilton moves up to third, maybe second, and then Jenson pits and would have still finished behind Alonso - albeit a place down from his actual finishing position.

But maybe they were expecting him to work wonders with the option tyres - he'd be lapping faster - and maybe also bridge the gap to Alonso. So it would be Red Bull 1-2, McLaren 3 -4 Ferari 5 - 23. :twisted:

McLaren should not be discouraged from this at all. :thumbup:
#220105
In my best Victor Meldrew voice "I don't believe it"; I believe the choice to start the race on the prime tyre was Jenson's; he has shown that he is willing to take tactical risks to get a better result; the two calls in the rain earlier in the season and the choice to run the F-Duct on Monza; this time it simply didn't pay off; it's just Horner running his mouth; trying to distract his rivals from their own developmental and strategist plans!

I like it :yes: .

See our F1 related articles too!