About FORUMula1.com
F1 and Motorsport Forums
F1 and Motorsport Forums
deMuRe wrote:and Ive seen you on personnal attacks toobud wrote:yeah typical MikeP99 attack the posterThat's a bit rich coming from you bud, I've been on the other end of your very personal rants many a time...such a lil keyboard warrior mate!!! really really tough!
737flier wrote:Mike you are a first class dimwit.This rather unflattering personal attack (watch it buddy) puts him at least in good company - halfwit Stewart...
Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point. 
8-ball wrote:ferrari did derserve to win the drivers title as their car won the most races and that had nothing to do with the politicking during the year. As for the WCC well thats open for debateNo they did not, they used an illegal tactic to hand it to Kimi. Had Alonso ceded his position then the FIA would have banned McLaren.
Mikep99 wrote:bud wrote:hey if youre "all about the message" then your message you send with this one isSorry Bud but the record books don't show that.
Ferrai one in 08 due to having a car with a V10 engine and higher downforce!
and BTW Ferrari didnt win the constructors on track this year, McLaren ended the year with 218 to Ferrari 204!
But I must admit that the WCC will always have awith me because Ferrari inherited it. Should be a Non event.
But don't take this to mean that McLaren should have won it. NO they cheated, got caught & were rightfully punished.
The WDC is a complete different story and fully justified & deserved.
Roll on 08
darwin_dali wrote:APOLOGIES Mike, it was not means as an arbitrary personal attack, simply an observation as to the reasoning (or otherwise) applied in the first post.737flier wrote:Mike you are a first class dimwit.This rather unflattering personal attack (watch it buddy) puts him at least in good company - halfwit Stewart...
737flier wrote:wheres the watch it buddy for whenever mike attacks people? dd youre worse than Max Mosely when choosing when to use your powerdarwin_dali wrote:APOLOGIES Mike, it was not means as an arbitrary personal attack, simply an observation as to the reasoning (or otherwise) applied in the first post.737flier wrote:Mike you are a first class dimwit.This rather unflattering personal attack (watch it buddy) puts him at least in good company - halfwit Stewart...
bud wrote:I noticed this too737flier wrote:wheres the watch it buddy for whenever mike attacks people? dd youre worse than Max Mosely when choosing when to use your powerdarwin_dali wrote:APOLOGIES Mike, it was not means as an arbitrary personal attack, simply an observation as to the reasoning (or otherwise) applied in the first post.737flier wrote:Mike you are a first class dimwit.This rather unflattering personal attack (watch it buddy) puts him at least in good company - halfwit Stewart...abit sympathetic to the Ferrari lads huh
DD to MM
Kimi has done it! The youngest ever F1 champion. A[…]
Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!