FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#200347
Safety Safety Safety,
"
Following an investigation instigated by AutoWeek, the Williams Formula One team said on Friday that Rubens Barrichello’s crash in the Monaco Grand Prix last weekend was caused when his car’s left rear wheel struck a loose drain cover.

A team statement said: “AT&T Williams confirmed today that the cause of Rubens Barrichello’s crash at the Monaco Grand Prix on Sunday, May 16, 2010, was a loose manhole cover at turn two. As Rubens’ car drove over the manhole cover, the cover was spun up and hit the rear left wheel, causing failure. The car was badly damaged in the ensuing crash which ended Rubens’ race. This incident has been reported to the FIA.”

FIA race director Charlie Whiting has asked the Monaco organizers about the incident. Usually, inspectors check the track carefully each morning, but it could be that the cover only came loose after being struck during the race.

Force India driver Vitantonio Liuzzi first suggested that something odd might have triggered Barrichello’s accident. The Italian, who was following Barrichello, told AW after the race that he had seen the Williams car flip up an object from the track multiple times over the course of several laps. Barrichello was running unusually close to the barrier when this happened, and on the final occasion, the Williams spun out of control.

“I was behind Rubens,” Liuzzi said. “It was pretty weird. I saw already two times before he was going really close the left guardrail and there was something lifting from the ground, then once I saw this thing lifting completely and I saw Rubens flying into the wall. I thought he touched the left wall, this is what it appeared to me.

“Something was lifting from the ground when a car was going that close to the left wall. He was always going really close to the left wall and there was this thing on the floor.”

AW reported Liuzzi’s words to Williams team bosses Frank Williams and Patrick Head at the team’s motor home. They were skeptical initially, because they only knew about the much-smaller loose drain cover that caused the third safety-car period, and which was further up the hill from where Barrichello crashed.

Williams subsequently put out a press release that said Barrichello had spun as the result of a suspension failure, which the team in effect took responsibility for, pending any new information.

However, on Monday before leaving Monaco, AW visited the site and found a drain cover exactly where Liuzzi said he had seen something strange. It was not welded down, as it should have been.

We sent our photos to Head, as well as to Williams technical director Sam Michael, together with Liuzzi’s testimony. We also forwarded some TV screenshots from Liuzzi’s car, which showed a foreign object on the track. Williams changed the direction of the investigation and asked Formula One Management for high definition on-board footage from both Liuzzi’s and Barrichello’s cars.

Meanwhile, we also called Whiting, who knew nothing of the second drain cover. After he received our photos, he went to view the drain cover for himself and was surprised to find that it was indeed loose. Whiting and Michael discussed the issue when they met during Thursday’s Technical Working Group meeting in London.

The mystery is, how did the heavy cover drop back into place after being hit each time without any track marshals noticing it? It is possible that a marshal replaced it during the safety-car period for Barrichello’s accident, but it seems unlikely that could have happened without race control learning of the issue.

Whiting has asked the ACM (the Monaco automobile club) whether any marshals have any more information. It remains to be seen whether the FIA takes the matter further



Read more: http://www.autoweek.com/article/2010052 ... z0od03U6Wh"
#200352
That is bad, if it had gone into the air it could've caused an incident like Massa's last year or worse.

Still no excuse for Barrichello to do what he did with his steering wheel, maybe Frank should put a bit of string going through the sleeves of Barrichellos overalls and tied to the wheel.
#200355
Did the report mention that Rubens threw his steering onto the track into the path of a following car who ran over it??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWVJafXCmMM&feature=related


I think that warrented some form of penalty. That was dangerous and unnecessary
#200360
Did the report mention that Rubens threw his steering onto the track into the path of a following car who ran over it??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWVJafXCmMM&feature=related


I think that warrented some form of penalty. That was dangerous and unnecessary

You're meant to stick the wheel back in once you get out the car, it's meant to be a fine if you don't I think.


I'm not sure if that still applies when the steering is wrecked.
#200361
Did the report mention that Rubens threw his steering onto the track into the path of a following car who ran over it??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWVJafXCmMM&feature=related


I think that warrented some form of penalty. That was dangerous and unnecessary

You're meant to stick the wheel back in once you get out the car, it's meant to be a fine if you don't I think.


I'm not sure if that still applies when the steering is wrecked.

The steering wheel still fully works, according to Chandhok he got a text from Jonathan Williams (Sir Frank's son) telling him this, so I think Barrichello will keep using it as if it's a lucky charm.
#200364
Did the report mention that Rubens threw his steering onto the track into the path of a following car who ran over it??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWVJafXCmMM&feature=related


I think that warrented some form of penalty. That was dangerous and unnecessary

You're meant to stick the wheel back in once you get out the car, it's meant to be a fine if you don't I think.


I'm not sure if that still applies when the steering is wrecked.

The steering wheel still fully works, according to Chandhok he got a text from Jonathan Williams (Sir Frank's son) telling him this, so I think Barrichello will keep using it as if it's a lucky charm.


Lol, no, I meant the rest of the steering system in the car. I think the wheel is meant to be put back in so the marshals can steer the car when clearing the track, that would be a bit pointless and in some cases time wasting if the front suspension is all smashed up.
#200374
I too have been under the impression that the rule does not apply when not just the steering is broken but if the car itself is unpushable due to any damage.

If Rubens knew it was the manhole cover that cause his crash I would say he was morally justified in being so outraged as to throw the steering wheel onto the track in anger, but that it is still an infraction and he should have received a penalty. If he thought it was suspension failure, I'd be angry about that too but it's not as much justification.
#200382
Yeah they always throw them out but never on the track and they always put them back(unless they don't have to when the car is smashed). If they aren't angry they throw them so they are still within the footprint area of the car or place it on the cowl. Throwing it that far shows the driver is angry.
Hello, new member here

Yeah, not very active here, unfortunately. Is it […]

See our F1 related articles too!