FORUMula1.com

[texasmr2]

And the chess thing came up from this:

I've long thought Ferrari, when MS was their driver, treated the sport like a chess game........

and you agree that things weren't always quite so clean.

No I don't and all I care about are ontrack results.

[stonemonkey]

And the chess thing came up from this:

I've long thought Ferrari, when MS was their driver, treated the sport like a chess game........

and you agree that things weren't always quite so clean.

No I don't and all I care about are ontrack results.

So things aren't any cleaner with JT than they were with MM?

[texasmr2]

And the chess thing came up from this:

I've long thought Ferrari, when MS was their driver, treated the sport like a chess game........

and you agree that things weren't always quite so clean.

No I don't and all I care about are ontrack results.

So things aren't any cleaner with JT than they were with MM?

Reread my post and since JT has only been in power for 3 races do you think it is fair to judge him in the same context as MM?

[stonemonkey]

........ I think the game has been cleaned up quite considerably since MM was booted wouldn't you?

and you agree that things weren't always quite so clean.

No I don't and all I care about are ontrack results.

[Gaz]

And the chess thing came up from this:

I've long thought Ferrari, when MS was their driver, treated the sport like a chess game........

and you agree that things weren't always quite so clean.

No I don't and all I care about are ontrack results.

So things aren't any cleaner with JT than they were with MM?

I'd say so Lewis's "weaving" would of prob got a penalty under mosleys system without the past F1 driver.

that would of ruined the race for me so i'd say so far so good for JT

[headless]

And the chess thing came up from this:

I've long thought Ferrari, when MS was their driver, treated the sport like a chess game........

and you agree that things weren't always quite so clean.

No I don't and all I care about are ontrack results.

So things aren't any cleaner with JT than they were with MM?

I'd say so Lewis's "weaving" would of prob got a penalty under mosleys system without the past F1 driver.

that would of ruined the race for me so i'd say so far so good for JT

John Terry?

[texasmr2]

........ I think the game has been cleaned up quite considerably since MM was booted wouldn't you?

and you agree that things weren't always quite so clean.

No I don't and all I care about are ontrack results.

My typo my bad yes I meant to say that I agree.

[7UpJordan]

I miss last year's unpredictability and the constant change of pecking order between races, this year the order has been exactly the same at every race so far.

[bud]

Yeah so far JT has been pretty good, I was concerned he'd be a MM continuation but so far that's not been the case! Infact you've hardly heard about him which means he is doing a good job!

[EwanM]

I predict a riot.

[stonemonkey]

I predict a riot.

In China?

[EwanM]

I predict a riot.

In China?

Hmm on second thoughts.

[oaba09]

Not really....F1 is not just about close races and overtaking...It's about the engineering, the technology, the technical skills of the drivers....It needs some improvements but F1 is never boring....

[texasmr2]

[darwin dali]

Not really....F1 is not just about close races and overtaking...It's about the engineering, the technology, the technical skills of the drivers....It needs some improvements but F1 is never boring....

Well said.