- 08 Apr 10, 09:04#195005
A racing car that does not win, is just art
Scarbs had a dew ideas of how they where doing it on his blog. things like changing the temperature of shock absorbers etc

A racing car that does not win, is just art
F1 and Motorsport Forums

Denthúl wrote:Hmmmm. This is very true. Must be something like Jabberwoky said-a sneaky way of doing it.......maybe McLaren found a sneaky way tooracechick wrote:The Malaysia win? No. See Ferrari's flexi-floor in Australia 2007, Renault's mass-damper wins etc.A thought! What if McLaren put in their ride height thing deliberately to get it banned so that they can now challenge red bull's? And if they do that successfully, then red bull will have used an illegal device,so do they have to give their win up?
racechick wrote:So if they are breaking the laws will they loose the win?stop looking for handouts RC.
antoniob wrote:yeah we dont wanna be like Ferrari now RC.racechick wrote:So if they are breaking the laws will they loose the win?stop looking for handouts RC.
bud wrote:antoniob wrote:yeah we dont wanna be like Ferrari now RC.racechick wrote:So if they are breaking the laws will they loose the win?stop looking for handouts RC.

Denthúl wrote:Since they passed scrutiny for each race... i doubt they can take the results away. Unless they have done so (passing scrutiny) by cheating and/or misleading the Fia. Also, if they are exploiting a loophole, their car is legal unless the rules are modified.racechick wrote:The Malaysia win? No. See Ferrari's flexi-floor in Australia 2007, Renault's mass-damper wins etc.A thought! What if McLaren put in their ride height thing deliberately to get it banned so that they can now challenge red bull's? And if they do that successfully, then red bull will have used an illegal device,so do they have to give their win up?
f1ea wrote:The flexi-floor used by Ferrari (and others) in Australia 2007 was designed to pass the FIA stress tests, but under the significantly higher loads during races would flex. They still kept the results.Denthúl wrote:Since they passed scrutiny for each race... i doubt they can take the results away. Unless they have done so (passing scrutiny) by cheating and/or misleading the Fia.racechick wrote:The Malaysia win? No. See Ferrari's flexi-floor in Australia 2007, Renault's mass-damper wins etc.A thought! What if McLaren put in their ride height thing deliberately to get it banned so that they can now challenge red bull's? And if they do that successfully, then red bull will have used an illegal device,so do they have to give their win up?

Denthúl wrote:if Mclaren used a Flexi Floor Ron Dennis, LEwis and Alonso would be exacuted by Firing squad thoughf1ea wrote:The flexi-floor used by Ferrari (and others) in Australia 2007 was designed to pass the FIA stress tests, but under the significantly higher loads during races would flex. They still kept the results.Denthúl wrote:Since they passed scrutiny for each race... i doubt they can take the results away. Unless they have done so (passing scrutiny) by cheating and/or misleading the Fia.racechick wrote:The Malaysia win? No. See Ferrari's flexi-floor in Australia 2007, Renault's mass-damper wins etc.A thought! What if McLaren put in their ride height thing deliberately to get it banned so that they can now challenge red bull's? And if they do that successfully, then red bull will have used an illegal device,so do they have to give their win up?
Jabberwocky wrote:Scarbs had a dew ideas of how they where doing it on his blog. things like changing the temperature of shock absorbers etcThat was made illegal when someone was doing it some time ago. The only thing I can think of is some sort of dead (or extremely stiff) zone covering the range of full-empty fuel in the spring setup using multiple springs but it's a total stab in the dark and no idea how such a thing would actually behave in a car with downforce.

McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]
Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!