- 18 Dec 09, 22:59#174881
very useful mate
A racing car that does not win, is just art
I think it's a shame the only track made for F1 in nearly 10 years that drivers actually genuinely enjoy is failing, whilst tracks like Valencia, and Bahrain prosper.
But I guess some tracks have to make way for Korea and India.and Turkey is being picked off first.
nah ecclestone wants more races = more money its the teams that don't want that many as i understand it.
I don't see why he should charge them more tho since its not like they make money from ticket sales right? - i assumed it all went to the circuit.
I think what happens is, they pay Bernie. Then the track uses the money from ticket sales to make up for some of that money lost. Then the rest of the money comes from getting you to buy merchandise on track, as well as on track sponsorship.
All the same, Bernie is ripping of the tracks and he charges far too much money for nothing. I mean, what are the tracks paying for. It's no wonder Silverstone is struggling. If he lowered charges, tracks could lower ticket prices, and more spectators would come.
The circuits are suppose to make money from this, but really, the only person who wins is Bernie. It's a stupid system.
This would help a lot:
very useful mate

A racing car that does not win, is just art