- 10 Nov 09, 00:19#169063I think vaatanen and Ferrari have a valid point, the big manufacturers (Honda, BMW, Toyota, Renault) always *NEED* to invest in promotion and marketing, even during recession. F1 was a very good way to promote, but with increasing limitations on regs, especially engines, and let's not forget kers, which was implemented with restrictions... the appeal of F1 was vanishing for them. Keeping up with money and research would not mean much to them in terms of marketing, in a standardizing f1 methinks!
'bout bridgestone... it's due to them being the only supplier, paired with the fact they still had to PAY big money to supply f1. It shouldn't have come as a shock to FIA, looking at it that way. can you see bridgestone claiming through promos to be the world champions? they supply everyone, from first to dead last. paying. and probably getting bad publicity from this, since on most races the focus was drawn to tyres only when they were graining, blowing, deteriorating.
I'd love to see 'em race twice in tracks like Spa. Second time there could be in reverse for all I care. Bring in Watkins Glen, Kyalami, Imola, keep Silverstone... and reduce those start-stop boring tracks! Asking too much, yeah.