FORUMula1.com

[bud]

thats just it, i shouldnt have to go out into a public place and see some fat tard naked just because they feel like it. Society has many rules that govern us that we wont all agree on. Its a matter of dealing with it and move on to something more important than being naked or not.

The argument could easily be turned round, though. Someone is well-within their rights to ask why they should have to go out in a public place wearing clothes just because you don't want to see it. It works both ways.

you always oppose me huh!

and no it doesnt not when it is against the law

I am aware it is against the law, but that does not stop people having the right to oppose the law and ask why it is in place.

I oppose the law that forbids killing people. why is it in place?

[Denthúl]

thats just it, i shouldnt have to go out into a public place and see some fat tard naked just because they feel like it. Society has many rules that govern us that we wont all agree on. Its a matter of dealing with it and move on to something more important than being naked or not.

The argument could easily be turned round, though. Someone is well-within their rights to ask why they should have to go out in a public place wearing clothes just because you don't want to see it. It works both ways.

you always oppose me huh!

and no it doesnt not when it is against the law

I am aware it is against the law, but that does not stop people having the right to oppose the law and ask why it is in place.

I oppose the law that forbids killing people. why is it in place?

Your post is pointless. There is nothing that states you can't oppose that law.

[texasmr2]

Gentlemen gentlemen gentleman please take your debate/disagreement to pm's so the subject of this topic is not completely lost, I beg you.

[bud]

thats just it, i shouldnt have to go out into a public place and see some fat tard naked just because they feel like it. Society has many rules that govern us that we wont all agree on. Its a matter of dealing with it and move on to something more important than being naked or not.

The argument could easily be turned round, though. Someone is well-within their rights to ask why they should have to go out in a public place wearing clothes just because you don't want to see it. It works both ways.

you always oppose me huh!

and no it doesnt not when it is against the law

I am aware it is against the law, but that does not stop people having the right to oppose the law and ask why it is in place.

I oppose the law that forbids killing people. why is it in place?

Your post is pointless. There is nothing that states you can't oppose that law.

haha now ive heard it all, taken opposing me just for the sake of it to a new level. Ii am flattered.

[texasmr2]

Gentlemen gentlemen gentleman please take your debate/disagreement to pm's so the subject of this topic is not completely lost, I beg you.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[Denthúl]

thats just it, i shouldnt have to go out into a public place and see some fat tard naked just because they feel like it. Society has many rules that govern us that we wont all agree on. Its a matter of dealing with it and move on to something more important than being naked or not.

The argument could easily be turned round, though. Someone is well-within their rights to ask why they should have to go out in a public place wearing clothes just because you don't want to see it. It works both ways.

you always oppose me huh!

and no it doesnt not when it is against the law

I am aware it is against the law, but that does not stop people having the right to oppose the law and ask why it is in place.

I oppose the law that forbids killing people. why is it in place?

Your post is pointless. There is nothing that states you can't oppose that law.

haha now ive heard it all, taken opposing me just for the sake of it to a new level. Ii am flattered.

Get over yourself, please.

If you can't actually participate in a debate as an adult, don't bother. I'm not opposing you for the sake of it, I'm not really opposing you at all. I've merely presented a point and stated a fact. You can disagree with whatever laws you want, it's all part of your freedoms. Disagreeing with something doesn't mean you act against it, as you are still bound by the law, but you don't have to like it. I don't agree with the laws surrounding software patents and copyright, but that doesn't mean I break those laws because I don't like them.

Are you really, honestly trying to say that you shouldn't question the laws you are made to abide by if you don't feel they are right?

Gentlemen gentlemen gentleman please take your debate/disagreement to pm's so the subject of this topic is not completely lost, I beg you.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

It's all relevant.

[bud]

thats just it, i shouldnt have to go out into a public place and see some fat tard naked just because they feel like it. Society has many rules that govern us that we wont all agree on. Its a matter of dealing with it and move on to something more important than being naked or not.

The argument could easily be turned round, though. Someone is well-within their rights to ask why they should have to go out in a public place wearing clothes just because you don't want to see it. It works both ways.

you always oppose me huh!

and no it doesnt not when it is against the law

I am aware it is against the law, but that does not stop people having the right to oppose the law and ask why it is in place.

I oppose the law that forbids killing people. why is it in place?

Your post is pointless. There is nothing that states you can't oppose that law.

haha now ive heard it all, taken opposing me just for the sake of it to a new level. Ii am flattered.

Get over yourself, please.

If you can't actually participate in a debate as an adult, don't bother. I'm not opposing you for the sake of it, I'm not really opposing you at all. I've merely presented a point and stated a fact. You can disagree with whatever laws you want, it's all part of your freedoms. Disagreeing with something doesn't mean you act against it, as you are still bound by the law, but you don't have to like it. I don't agree with the laws surrounding software patents and copyright, but that doesn't mean I break those laws because I don't like them.

Are you really, honestly trying to say that you shouldn't question the laws you are made to abide by if you don't feel they are right?

Ok Denthul post a naked photo of yourself walk the walk talk the talk!

and yeah its called being able to vote if you dont like a law. but we are talking moral basics here in which you are saying its ok to question them. I mean killing? cmon mate and youre saying im not acting like an adult when you come up with that bullpoo

[Denthúl]

and yeah its called being able to vote if you dont like a law. but we are talking moral basics here in which you are saying its ok to question them. I mean killing? cmon mate and youre saying im not acting like an adult when you come up with that bullpoo

You can question whatever you want, it's freedom of speech. Nobody will take you particularly seriously, but you are still entitled to make your point. The difference between the two points here is that public nudity has no detrimental effect on the health of others whereas killing someone, obviously, does. Laws surrounding public nudity are not for any sensible reasons, whereas those for killing are.

Ok Denthul post a naked photo of yourself walk the walk talk the talk!

Have you read the rest of the thread?

[texasmr2]

I have a naked pic of myself in the 'dungeon' wanna see??

[vaptin]

Before this tread careered off topic, there was the question about umpalumpa and nudity. Isn't the only reason they're linked because of our laws that generally ban nudity, which means the majority of times people see it it is being linked with umpalumpa (look at tv programs),

Rather than for an inherently logical reason.

[bud]

and yeah its called being able to vote if you dont like a law. but we are talking moral basics here in which you are saying its ok to question them. I mean killing? cmon mate and youre saying im not acting like an adult when you come up with that bullpoo

You can question whatever you want, it's freedom of speech. Nobody will take you particularly seriously, but you are still entitled to make your point. The difference between the two points here is that public nudity has no detrimental effect on the health of others whereas killing someone, obviously, does. Laws surrounding public nudity are not for any sensible reasons, whereas those for killing are.

Ok Denthul post a naked photo of yourself walk the walk talk the talk!

Have you read the rest of the thread?

over it denthul, if i said i am for everyone to be nude and society is stupid then you would have said the opposite! its always the same. so theres no point going any further with you.

[Denthúl]

I have a naked pic of myself in the 'dungeon' wanna see??

[texasmr2]

I have a naked pic of myself in the 'dungeon' wanna see??

PM sent j/k

[FerrariFan63]

I oppose the law that forbids killing people. why is it in place?

That explains a lot!

But remaining serious here, some laws are well founded in logic and reason, and some aren't. Here we're discussing the laws/cultural attitudes on nudity. That someone opposes another law has no bearing on whether the laws/social attitudes on nudity are valid or not.

[FerrariFan63]

Before this tread careered off topic, there was the question about umpalumpa and nudity. Isn't the only reason they're linked because of our laws that generally ban nudity, which means the majority of times people see it it is being linked with umpalumpa (look at tv programs),

Rather than for an inherently logical reason.

Very much agreed.