Santander Ferrari/Better or Worse?

Santander Ferrari/Better or Worse?#151147

By Brandz - 10 Sep 09, 18:56

- 10 Sep 09, 18:56#151147

Mock up i did...

What looks best??

Re: Santander Ferrari/Better or Worse?#151258

By scotty - 11 Sep 09, 00:30

- 11 Sep 09, 00:30#151258

If it simply said Marlboro (as it should) it'd be best! :twisted:

Good photoshop work though.

Rising number one of Formula 1, Juan - Juan, one wonders should Juan only win one Formula 1 one year, would Juan have won that one in round one, Juan??

Re: Santander Ferrari/Better or Worse?#151265

By bud - 11 Sep 09, 00:47

- 11 Sep 09, 00:47#151265

Marlboro is still around next year i thought? I see Santander imagery being in the same areas that Vodafone had on the Ferrari.

Re: Santander Ferrari/Better or Worse?#151267

By scotty - 11 Sep 09, 00:59

- 11 Sep 09, 00:59#151267

Yeah, i heard Marlboro have a deal until 2011. But are they still gonna be the title sponsor (ie will they still get the prime spots on the car)...?

Rising number one of Formula 1, Juan - Juan, one wonders should Juan only win one Formula 1 one year, would Juan have won that one in round one, Juan??

Re: Santander Ferrari/Better or Worse?#151271

By bud - 11 Sep 09, 01:04

- 11 Sep 09, 01:04#151271

not too sure, i think they are still going to be Scuderia Ferrari Marlboro. and Shell will not yield the side pod either.

Re: Santander Ferrari/Better or Worse?#151282

By awesomerusty - 11 Sep 09, 02:10

- 11 Sep 09, 02:10#151282

good ps work!
Santander hmm..i still prefer the Marlboro one

The cure for unhappiness is happiness, I don't care what anyone says.

Re: Santander Ferrari/Better or Worse?#151283

By darwin dali - 11 Sep 09, 03:45

- 11 Sep 09, 03:45#151283

AUGUST 25, 2008
The e-magazine GrandPrix+ is reporting that Marlboro may be preparing to end its relationship with Ferrari, earlier than has been thought. The existing deal is due to run until the end of 2011. This six-year deal, signed in 2005, was for the entire car and is believed to have been worth around $1.1bn, although the tobacco company had (and has used) the right to sell the space on the cars to other sponsors.

The departure of Marlboro is not as big a worry as it might appear for Ferrari as most of Ferrari's sponsors would simply switch to direct deals with Ferrari rather than going through Philip Morris. There would be some spare space on the cars but Ferrari is such a strong and successful brand that there are certain to be other sponsors who would leap at the chance of a Ferrari deal.

Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point.

Re: Santander Ferrari/Better or Worse?#151288

By bud - 11 Sep 09, 04:11

- 11 Sep 09, 04:11#151288

cheers for that

Re: Santander Ferrari/Better or Worse?#151294

By EwanM - 11 Sep 09, 09:49

- 11 Sep 09, 09:49#151294

Indeed, that confirmed the advertising situation for me. I thought that was how Ferrari did it, but I wasn't sure.

Forumula One: The World's Greatest Sport

Re: Santander Ferrari/Better or Worse?#151440

By McLaren Fan - 11 Sep 09, 16:32

- 11 Sep 09, 16:32#151440

If Ferrari's livery for next season looks like Brandz's image, then I'd say the Marlboro barcode looks a lot better.

Anyway, it's time Ferrari came into line with the rest of the teams, not to mention other sporting organisations, and stopped advertising tobacco.

Ayrton Senna: WDC 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991
McLaren: WCC 1974, 1984, 1985, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1998, 1999, 2007
McLaren: WDC 1974, 1976, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1998, 1999, 2008

Re: Santander Ferrari/Better or Worse?#151447

By McLaren - 11 Sep 09, 16:38

- 11 Sep 09, 16:38#151447

If Ferrari's livery for next season looks like Brandz's image, then I'd say the Marlboro barcode looks a lot better.

Anyway, it's time Ferrari came into line with the rest of the teams, not to mention other sporting organisations, and stopped advertising tobacco.

You can't say that about the FIA's favorite son :hehe: