- 01 Jul 09, 12:04#130175
Interesting information...
Let's see, given JB and BrawnGP's advantage in handling less-than-ideal compounds, could this mean that this kind of advantage is less of an advantage now? I want to comment about RedBull, but I am not sure how they handle their tires...
thoughts?
Bridgestone scrap compound 'gap' policy
Reverting to consecutive compounds from Hungary
01/07/09 10:24
Compound experiment fails for Bridgestone
Bridgestone has scrapped its policy of leaving a gap between the two types of tyre compounds. At the remaining rounds of the season following next Sunday's German Grand Prix, the sport's official tyre supplier will instead revert to supplying consecutive compounds.
Fernando Alonso had hit out at the situation earlier this year, slamming the policy as in the interests of a false spectacle while making the drivers look ‘ridiculous’.
"We have made the change to the tyre allocation concept based on the data we have collected from races so far this year combined with our knowledge of the tracks we visit for these (next) races," director of tyre development Hirohide Hamashima said.
He said continuing the 'gap' policy would have caused problems at the next five races, including the twisty Hungary and Valencia, cool Spa Francorchamps and Monza in Italy.
“The cars of 2009 are very different to those used last year so we have learnt a lot so far this year, and they do use their tyres differently from before,” Hamashima added.
E.A. © CAPSIS International
Source: GMM
Interesting information...
Let's see, given JB and BrawnGP's advantage in handling less-than-ideal compounds, could this mean that this kind of advantage is less of an advantage now? I want to comment about RedBull, but I am not sure how they handle their tires...
thoughts?
2015 Best Season Yet! Forza Ferrari!